My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-17-2003 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2003
>
03-17-2003 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/9/2023 1:37:33 PM
Creation date
2/9/2023 1:36:26 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
229
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />Wednesday. February 19,2003 <br />6.30 o'clock p.m. <br />(m-2869 DR. ROBERT CUMMT, Continued) <br />listed conditions, plus a sixth allowing the applicant to routinely maintain the drive access <br />as approved. On the other hand, if the Planning Commission feels that there is no hardship <br />to permit the construction of a dnseway through a wetland, and that driveway <br />reconstruction is not necessary to preserse the owner's rights, then the application for <br />variances and CUPs should be denied. <br />Dr. Gumnit stated that he w ished to fill as a maintenance measure to maintain the trail. <br />Chnir Smith questioned whether there were other locations on the property where the <br />horses could be managed. <br />Chaput submitted into record five letters the City had recei\L*d from neighbors in <br />opposition to the application, as follows; Kirsten Burton 2601 Ramey Road. Dr. and Mrs, <br />Kenneth Riff of 900 Old Crystal Bay Road. Sharon Winslow of 1205 French Creek Drive. <br />Marcia Hanson leprescnting the French Creek Association, and James Peterson 2280 <br />French Creek Circle. <br />Dr. Gumnil's representative reiterated that the proposed driveway had always been an <br />existing path, w hich had merely detenorated ov er time. <br />Dr. Gumnit stated that the road or path had been there since somewhere around the World <br />War II era. <br />The applicant's representative stated that two scenarios have presented themselves, the <br />MCWD has suggested that a culvert be installed with gravel rock fill and that they steer <br />clear of the OHWL of 930’. on the other hand. Julie Eckman of the DNR has suggested <br />that they lay a geoiextile fabric under the gravel with no culvert. He pointed out that <br />neither agency is in agreement or ready to grant approvals and are hoping to hear what the <br />City decides. <br />Chair Smith asked what the purpose for building up the trail would be. for horses, <br />pedcstnans. or v ehicles. <br />Dr. Gumnit staled that he and his family have always used the path to the hill and they <br />would like to h • able to bnng a tractor across to clean up the island. He indicated that they <br />would like to bum out the non native junk vegetation on the island and replant it with <br />native grasses and flowers, the proposed electric fence would keep the horses out of the <br />wetland area and be less obtrusive than a wood fence. Overall. Dr. Gumnit believed that <br />his proposed enhancements would be belter for the wildlife than what is currently there and <br />offer better views for his neighbors. He reiterated that the w ide path leading to the island <br />had always been there but a sunken area was in need of repair. <br />PAGE 18 of 26
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.