My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-17-2003 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2003
>
03-17-2003 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/9/2023 1:37:33 PM
Creation date
2/9/2023 1:36:26 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
229
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
r <br />MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLAN’NING COMMISSION MEETING <br />Wednesday. February 19,2003 <br />6:30 o'clock p.m. <br />(#03-2865 KEVIN MANLEY. Continued) <br />Chair Smith asked slafThow the Commission should vie\^' the blueprint with stamp. <br />Gafiron reiterated that the previous application contained no verbiage about a deck and <br />that the building inspector never issued a permit for it. He maintained that the deck was <br />merely ghosted on the plans <br />Fritzler stated that he would deny both decks. <br />Mabudth indicated that she needed more information with regard to the side deck. She <br />questioned whether what was needed as an expanded w'alkway for safety reasons. <br />Manley asked how w ide the grade level walkway deck could be. As it stands now the deck <br />Is 3’ wide and 1.5' off the ground. <br />Gaffron indicated that a 4' wide walkway was typical. <br />Mabusth stated that she would like the building inspector to look at the walkway. <br />Chair Smith asked if the Commission could approve the gravel portion of the application <br />and deny the deck portions of the application. <br />Gaffron suggested that tabling the application would not hinder the applicant as the work <br />cannot be done this time of year anyway. <br />Mabusth agreed that tabling the application would benefit the applicant, allowing him time <br />to beef up his hardships. She felt his application was missing several of the hardships he <br />had mentioned in person this evening. <br />Manley asked if there was hope for approvals if he tabled and cam back with additional <br />information. <br />Mabusth stated that she needed to be convinced that the east side deck'walkway was <br />necessary as a safety issue. <br />Rahn stated that he did not see a hardship that would allow the applicant more than a 4* <br />walkway. <br />Rahn moved, Mabusth seconded, to recommend approval of Application #03-2865, <br />Kevin Manley, 1973 Eagerness Point Road, granting approval of after-the-facl <br />lakeshore setback, average setback, and 0-75 ’ hardcover variances for the <br />construction of the 4,5'X12* attached deck on the west side of the residence as it was <br />noted on the original plan and not increasing hardcover or structural cover; approval <br />PAGE 13 of 26
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.