03-17-2003 Planning Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEEl ING Wednesday, February 19. 2003 6:3U o'clock p.m. («03-2872 TERRY AND CHRISTY MORSE. Continued) GalTron indicated that combining the four lots would be a simple matter of filing the appropriate paperwork, and that doing so. would not change the value of the overall property and would allow him to recei\ e one tax statement instead of four. There were no public comments. Mabusth moved. Chair Smith seconded, to recommend approval of Application 2872, Terr> and Christy Morse. 20.S0 Spates Asenue, granting a sariance to add a second story on the most southwesterly portion of the existing structure, 20.6* from the side lot line adjacent to a street where 50’ is required, subject to the condition that the applicant apply for the legal combination of lots 1,2,3, and 6 to he combined with the homestead parcel N OTE: Ayes 6, Nays 0. NEW BUSINESS (1*2) «03-2865 KEMN MANLEY, 1973 EAGERNESS POINT ROAD, VARIANC ES The Commission returned to this Application after Item 4. as the applicant was not present (#3) 1^03-2866 JUDY AND DAMD ZOSCTIKL, 2040 SIIAD^WOOD ROAD, VARIANCES 6:44 -7:02 P.M. Judy and David Zoschke, Applicants, were present, Chaput reported that the applicants had requested a lot coverage by structure variance of 2,848 s.f (l().3"o) where 2.620 s.f (15"o) is permitted. 6.442 s.f. (57.00*®) hardcover within the 75-250* lakeshore setback zone where 2.821 s.f. (25%) is permitted, and average lakeshore setback encroaching 21’ in order to replace an existing 507.6 s.f. lakeside deck, enclosing 151 s.f as patio area. As the addition of a second story in l‘W3 resulted in the removal of the r*H>f for the existing deck. Chaput pointed out that due to deterioration of the floor^ .•.l•4. the applicants wish to replace the existing deck She noted that the proposed pa» c.wX'.surc docs not increase the si/c of the deck As it is City policy to allow one 4’ v\ide stairway with landings, and retaining walls Wuhin the 0-75 ’ setback /one Chaput suggested that one of the two sets of steps to the lake could potentially he removed to reduce hardcover. She continued by noting that there was a significant amount of concrete patio and walkway within the /one. and suggested if repair was found necessary, a portion of this could be removed as well. Further hardcover reduction could be accomplished through reduction of drivew ay closest to the property PAGE 2 of 26 7