Laserfiche WebLink
L <br />1 <br />3. The property U in an area where the general development is consistent with other properties in <br />the locality. <br />•j <br />4. If the moQumeiits/gates are set back to meet die required street setback, but over the allowed <br />6*. they would still require a variance. They would be coosideied an accessory structure and be <br />located closer lo the road than the principal structure. <br />S. Other issues raised by the Planning CommisstoiL <br />Staff Recamawadatiaa; <br />Based on die numerous monuments/gates located throughout the city, staff recommends denial of the <br />monumentt/gates as proposed. If the applicant wishes to redesign the proposed monuments and <br />gates keeping the height to 7\ moving the pedestrian gale back out of the right-of-way and meeting <br />the recommended 20 ’ width by the tire marshal, then a recoiiunendation of approval would be <br />justified based on past approvals by the City Council. <br />«03-2t7l MacDonald 4 Mack Architects'Ed Hnnin <br />415 OronoOrchard Roads <br />3/12/2003 <br />Pl^4or4