My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-17-2003 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2003
>
03-17-2003 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/9/2023 1:37:33 PM
Creation date
2/9/2023 1:36:26 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
229
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Side Yard Setbacks <br />S'orth side setback: 11ie proposed addition follo\\'s the existing house line, located 8.4’ from the <br />side lot line M-here 10’ is required. With 2.5* overhangs, the overhangs are 5.9’ from the <br />north side lot line. <br />South side setback: The proposed addition on the sur\cy follows the e.xisting house line, located <br />9.5’ from the side lot line where 10’ is required. However, the addition also includes a <br />decorative wall, shown on the elevation and floor plan with a width of 7 ’ and a 1.5’ <br />overhang, further encroaching into the side setback. 'The total encroachment of this w all and <br />its overl^g is 8.5 feel, leaving it 1 ’ from the lot line. <br />On the south side of the home, the applicant proposes to reduce hardcover and structure by <br />decreasing the size of the existing main entr>- landing deck. The existing 75 s.f landing deck <br />and steps will be removed and replaced with 35 s.f. of landing and steps, located 6.5’ from <br />the south side lot line. <br />However, there exists a large overhang completely covering the existing entry deck that will <br />not be changed. Even though the landing below will be reduced in size, the overhang <br />remains. From the building line, located 10’ from the side lot line at this location, the <br />overhang is 5* in depth. Therefore, this overhang will continue to encroach 5’ into the <br />required side setback where only a 1.5’ encroachment is allowed. <br />fiardcover <br />Existing hardcox-er exceeds the ma.ximum permitted within both the 0*75 ’ and 75 ’-250’ <br />hardcox cr zones. Even though the proposed addition is located in the 75 ’*250’ hardcover zone, it <br />has been the City ’s practice to request removal of hardcover in the 0-75 ’ zone when excesses <br />exist. <br />0-75 * Hardcover Zone: 1 here c.vists 554 s.f. (14.85® b) of hardcover within this zone where none <br />is permitted. The applicant proposes to remove an existing deck at the shoreline (111 s.f.) <br />(located next to the neighbor’s shed) and .shed (69 s.f.). reducing the hardcover to 374 s f <br />(10.03?o). Remaining hardcover includes one set of brick steps less than 4’ in width to access <br />the lake, and retaining walls (keystone and wood). <br />75 ’*250’ Hardcover Zone: There exists 3.528 s.f. (67.58®/o) of hardcover within this zone where <br />1.305 s.f (25®/o) is permitted. The changes to the house and deck and steps on the south side, <br />some of which is already hardcover, result in a net decrease of 20 s.f or a total of 3,508 s f <br />(67.20®/*) of hardcover w ithin this zone. <br />Lot Coverage Bv Structure <br />Lots less than 10,000 s.f in area are allowed 1.500 s.f of structural coverage subject to other <br />more limiung standards. ‘The applicant proposes to remove a shed and deck, located within 75 ’ of <br />the OHWL of Lake Minnetonka, and reduce the size of the side deck. With the removals and <br />rOJ-23-’Shane Rudd <br />3N2003 <br />Page 3 of?
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.