My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-17-2003 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2003
>
03-17-2003 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/9/2023 1:37:33 PM
Creation date
2/9/2023 1:36:26 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
229
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
lakeshore setback and setback from the OHWL would not change from the existing <br />strocture; The house could be shortened S’to meet a 10* rear setback; <br />8. The proposal meets the 10’ side yard setbacks and is less than the 1,500 s.f. lot coverage <br />by structure permitted for the lot; <br />9. Ihm is a culvert diaining under the lot from a wetland to the south and into Lake <br />Miiuietonka. The City will not permit a home to be constructed over an existing cuKxrt; <br />10. Other issues raised by the Planning Commission. <br />SlalT RccooiaMBdatioM: <br />Staff recommends approval of the requested variances for new construction on the lot, with the <br />following conditions; <br />1. The tear setback should be reduced from the proposed 10’ to 5 ’ (or the length of the <br />home should be reduced by S’) in order to provide adequate driveway depth from Cry’stal <br />Bay Road, maintaining the existing structure’s setback from the OHWL and <br />encroachment into the average lakeshore setback; <br />2. A building of no more than 30’ and no more than 2 '/i stories in height will be pennitted <br />to be constructed on the lot; <br />3. The existing ^vert murt be located prior to discussions with City staff regarding <br />relocation. Prior tc > btaining a building permit, a survey showing the proposed relocation <br />of the culvert will be required. A drainage and utility casement of 10’ in width will be <br />required over the lelocrted culvert as well. The costs of these improvements will be the <br />financial responsibility of the property owner, <br />4. Existing and proposed grading and drainage ways should be shown on plans submitted <br />for a building permit; <br />5. Erosion control measures must be installed, inspected and approved by the City prior to <br />any work on the site. <br />i <br />Srt /# L Laming <br />S/tS/2003 <br />f(^6ci7
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.