My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-16-2003 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2003
>
03-16-2003 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/9/2023 1:37:22 PM
Creation date
2/9/2023 1:36:06 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
246
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
CITYofORONOm <br />4. <br />RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br />NO 4 0 7 2 <br />The zoning loC is .446 acres, uhere 2 acres is required. <br />The existing structure docs not meet front or side setback requirements. <br />There is T>*pc 3 wetland on the northeast comer of the lot. A 26’ <br />setback from the wetland is required. <br />The lot width is 129.5’ where 200’ h required. <br />The front yard is 28.T existing where 32’ is proposed and 50* is required. <br />The side yard is 15.1’ existing where 25’ is proposed and 30’ Is required. <br />The rear yard is 58’ existing where 49 ’ is proposed and 50’ is required. <br />The proposed residence is iocaled in the 500-1,000’ setback area from <br />Lake Minnetonka. Hardcover will be less than 35%. <br />J. The proposed structural coverage will be less than 2,913.75 sq. ft. (15%). <br />The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar <br />to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that <br />granting the variance would not ad\ersely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor <br />pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely <br />serv-e as a convenience to the applicants, but is necessary to alleviate a <br />demonstrable hardship or difficult}; is necessary to preser\e a substantial <br />property right of the applicants; a.nd v ould be in keeping wi* the spirit and <br />intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. <br />The City Council has considered this application including the findings and <br />recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments <br />by the applicants and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety <br />and welfare of the community. <br />C. <br />D. <br />E. <br />F. <br />G. <br />H. <br />I. <br />Page 2 of 5 <br />i
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.