Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />Monday, May 19,2003 <br />6:00 o'clock p.m. <br />(#3 #03-2869 DR. ROBERT GUMMT, Continued) <br />Chair Smith reminded the applicants that a previous use docs not necessarily guarantee <br />them the ability to return to that original use since some time had passed and new slate <br />statutes had come into play. <br />Dr. Gumnit rcii-v^cd what he felt to be their hardship, which was the inability for them to <br />access or use 1.8 acres of their property. He stated that, legally, they did have the right to <br />place a fence on the island near the top; however, they wished to make use of a less <br />obtrusive low visibility wire fence near the lower portion of the island which would hardly <br />be noticeable. He pointed out that, if the island were viewed as adjacent to a wetland <br />versus the lake, he would be allowed to place the fence 26’ versus 150’ from the <br />‘shoreline'. <br />Having lived on this parcel for 15 years. Mrs. Graham noted that much has changed in <br />Orono over the years; where once you commonly saw horses from the road, now you <br />don t She stated ihal they have an extensive set of woods on their property n ar the road, <br />which she felt would be absurd to destroy to keep the horses on an intermittent basis. As <br />environmentally conscious individuals, she pointed cut that, at any rale, they should be <br />allowed access to 25% of their dry land property and to maintain it. <br />Commissioner Hannaford arrived at 6:30 P.M, <br />horT^^s^””^^ ® shelter on the island might fit into the picture for the <br />Graham stated that, technically, they could build a ga/ebo on top of the knoll. <br />Bremer encouraged the Commission to considLr the application as two separate items. <br />Dr. Guninit reiterated that they wish to have safe access to the island to maintain it and <br />separately, would like to be allowed to put up a w ire fence to keep their horses <br />occasionally. <br />Gaffron c®"curTcd that, legally, the applicants do have the right to build something if they <br />meet the 150* setbacks. <br />There were no public comments. <br />ofAe iKi^boI^*^* supported the application, indicating that it maintained the rural feel <br />PAGE 4 of 39