Laserfiche WebLink
«03-2907 <br />Junt12,2003 <br />Pa|e4 <br />Hardship Analytb <br />Im^itrlmg ypjk^em$/or rtriamce, tk, tUnmirng CcmmhshH ihttt cpmiUtr the tffea c/tkepropaui <br />Ihisapplka? ^ recommendations in regards lo the criteria for 'undue hardship" <br />I. I^e pn^y in question cannot be put lo a reasonable use if used under conditions allowed <br />by ihc official controls ” <br />W xvriances H ill be necessary lo make changes to thepropertv. hon c, .-r it is currently <br />being used for a reasonable use and can continue to be used in that manner nithout <br />variances. <br />^ ihc^uSdijIliiCT Circumstances unique to his properly not created by <br />The plight of the landowner is self created in that the landowner is proposing to make <br />changes to the property knowing full Hell in adx-ance the limitations of the property <br />3. “The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality ” <br />The lot at such a small size is an anomaly in the neighborhood and the granting of the <br />requested variances on it may tend to increase visual density and structure massing in the <br />neighborhooil. and reduce light air and open space which adjoining lots property maintain <br />4. -Economic considerations alone shall not constitute an undue hardship if reasonable use for <br />the property exists under the terms of the Zoning Chapler.*’ <br />Applicantshaxenotsuggestedthisproposalisforeconomicgain A neighboring property <br />owner has suggested this may be a spec house.. J <br />5. -Undue hardship also includes, but is not limited to. inadequate access to direct sunlight for <br />solar energy s>^tems. Variances shall be granted for earth sheltered construction as defined <br />in Minnesota Statutes. Section I I6J.06. Subd. 2. when in harmony with this Chapter " <br />S. ••The Bowd of Appals md Adjustments or the Couiteil may not pemiit as a variance any use <br />blot Applicable <br />(blot Applicable)