Laserfiche WebLink
F <br />skSe yaid setbacks of SO' from both streets. <br />The applicant is proposing the following renovations to the existing structure: <br />1) Change the structure of the roof above the ”Great Room" (the most southwesterly part of <br />the structure) to a higher pitch: and <br />2) Add a second floor area of 162.4 s.f. for two closets (above the northern portion of the <br />“Great Room"). <br />The existing structure dates back to 1910 and has had a number of reno%'ations since that time. <br />The port of the structure in question was added to the home in 1971 and is in need of repair. The <br />contractor. JLM Design Build, has stated that foundation under this part of the home is 12" block <br />and will support the addition. Proof of this information will be required at the time of building <br />permit s^iplication. There are no zoning applications on file for this property. <br />Hardship: <br />The applicants have included their statement uf hardship in Exhibit B. <br />Isivea for CoBsMcratioB: <br />1. <br />3. <br />4. <br />Railroad Avenue is a platted street but is not in use as a street. Should the structure be <br />required to meet the same setback from Railroad Avenue as it does from Spates Avenue, <br />an active street? <br />The proposed addition does not increase the footprint of the existing building or further <br />encroach into the SO' setback: <br />The structure within the SO' setback has been in existence since 1971; <br />Other issues raised by the Plaiming Commission. <br />Staff Rccooincndalions: <br />Staff recommends approval of a variance to add a second story ’ on the most southwesterly portion <br />of the existing princi^ structure. 20.6' from the side lot line adjacent to a street where SO'ts <br />required. <br />§03^2872 Ttrry <f Chrun Mone <br />2/13/2003 <br />Patt2i^3