My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-19-2003 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2003
>
02-19-2003 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/9/2023 1:36:54 PM
Creation date
2/9/2023 1:35:42 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
235
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
m- <br />%ji-v« <br />• <br />v>t^ <br />•A ' * <br />‘V“V. ' <br />•ffi ' <br />TO: <br />Fnr^: <br />a\TC: <br />SU3J2CT: <br />K. R. BenMn <br />II. F. l^lAlch <br />February 27, 1976 #9 <br />David J. Xnatirtpf • 12Cn Kildhurst Trail <br />Variance - Lot Area and width <br />o jif <br />• <br />* \ <br />This prsperty is located in an LR-IB residential zone. f!r. Ktusk^f U <br />rcqi:93ti^ a variance fren lot area and widtt requireeents o. eon acre <br />(43,550 sq. ft.) end 140 ft. lot width. His lot consists of .7 of an acre <br />rr.a is CO ft. %rtde therefora, he is rcquestlnn variances of ?.3,068 sq. ft <br />end SO ft. <br />The pTcposod location does neet all setback requizments. Hswever, we do <br />have a prcblen in the existing location of the residence on Ae preperty <br />to scuth. He have here a ncn-confonaing situation which we should <br />rectify. At the tine that the nsighborinf residence was cor.stnxtad surveys <br />v.-ere not required with building penait applications. This hsuse is new <br />encroaching the property line to such a d^ree that it does not even oeet <br />the fldnisza State requirexents. Ke night suggest as an agren^nt between <br />the property owners, to change the lot lines senewhat so we cen resolve <br />scse of the prebless. b’e could also consider slight variances on the sidu <br />tM noisetback to the north. <br />t;e should try to cset the 20 ft. distances between structures and also <br />prevent future prcblens fron any fences thnt night be crcctcJ aider r.iother <br />property cwners windows. <br />PUWriT (mnSSION - Ttarch 1, 1976 <br />Although not scheduled as part of the regular nccting, the remission <br />revie<ed the above application. They then directed tiwit I contact <br />llr. Kniskepf and state that the Planning Comission would look favorable <br />to a variRree if he by pri\Tite negiotations try to rc.slif3i the lot line <br />with his neighbor in order to alleviate the cne foot sotbaci; ordilcn. <br />TIK^IUTS CC:*IS31CH - 7!crch IS, 1978 <br />epryevai of the plan end ths vari -ixes ccnsistls9 <br />c5 F3 i l. cn Xzn r':U£j; .3 cc m tzTO . lot nrea esd a 6” \MrixiSO ca tha <br />r.V’*r rrl'-'i*; ert 'ii:' rcrtli lot liso. <br />CCr'Cih rL'5;T:i3 - :irrch U, 197« <br />c- • r’A vsrirxs cad lot lino roarraijcaoat oa prasntad <br />ir. n:-.'? rr.^r'-i pin. <br />1 <br />•V <br />k.*' • ?
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.