Laserfiche WebLink
I: <br />C*. <br />MCLVIM M. SICOCL <br />• •ONKv kOftacn <br />• lONCT baimiows <br />MAAOkO D. riKkO.JA. <br />AkkCN I. SACAA <br />THOMAS O. rCINSCAS <br />MOASIS M. SMCAMAM <br />SCOASB AKILkT <br />MICMAKL A. SWiANOrr <br />DAVID M. con <br />stbamkm a . afcaum <br />CNAAkKO A. MAYS <br />NAMCV C. DASHKA <br />kOWCLk J. NOTCSOOM <br />08CA0K r. M«OUNNIOCC* JA. <br />FAKDAie r. AOSSNSLATT <br />STSVSN D*DlAUYTKA <br />LAW orriccs <br />LEONARD* STREET AND DEINARO <br />ISOO NATIONAL CITY SANK BUILDING <br />BIO MAAOUSTTC AVCNUK <br />MINNKAFOLIS. MINNESOTA SS40C <br />TCLSAMONC ISIt) S9S-ISOO <br />CASLB AODAKSSl*LKONO*Nrk <br />N <br />t'JV ,November 11, 1978 <br />STKAHKM J. OAVIOSON <br />STKAHKN A. LITMAN <br />OAVIO C. ZALK <br />COWAAO M. MOKASrSLOCA <br />AOBKAT LKWIS AAAAOWS <br />ALAN J. WILSNSKY <br />KLOON J. BACNCKA, JA. <br />HUGH M. MAYNAAO <br />M. AATAICIA SCHArrSA <br />MICHAKL A. NKNICH <br />GACOOAY L.OAHL <br />i <br />I <br />OKOAOr ■.LKOAAAD (iSfZ-lSSS| <br />AATHUA L.M. 97988? CiSTT-lSSt| <br />• CNCOICT DKIAAAO <br />or eowMSKk <br />lAKNK SCOTT <br />NOV IM 1978 <br />Nllliam B. Van Nest <br />Mayor of City of Orono <br />3295 Carmen Road <br />Excelsior, Minnesota 55331 <br />city of orono <br />Re:Alexander Holzer, 2677 Casco Point Road <br />Conditional Use Permit and Variance <br />Dezu: Mayor Van Nest: <br />. <s • i <br />• us <br />After re-reading my letter of yesterday to you on the <br />above matter, I realized that there might be some confusion as <br />to one point which wao made. Hence, I am %^iting now to clarify <br />that point. <br />On page 2 of my previous letter, I discussed the implications <br />of SS31.433 and 31.434 of the Municipal Code of Orono. That point <br />which I had hoped to convey is that neither of those subsections <br />pemi^iii (I II witifi erected bn any portion of the front yard. <br />tached diaqr^^rith the outline in red was intended to illus- <br />ration of those subsections.trate" Uiiiy LllU Aviation of those subsections. By my ccxnments and <br />the use of that diagram, I did not Intend to imply that the remainder <br />of the wall constructed by Mr. Holzer is permitted by the ordinances. <br />Tn fact, there are several grounds upon which my clients oppose the <br />entire wall. <br />First, the entire wall constiructed by Mr. Holzer is a <br />retaining wall behind vdilch and underneath which a great deal of <br />illegal filling and grading has occurred. Second, the retaining <br />wall is anchored to the property by concrete footings. These walls <br />are more them single walls which are used to separate proper , les <br />or preserve privacy. They are intstead intended to support ‘ie <br />lateral force of the filling which has occurred.