05-22-1978 Planning Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

n r TO: FRCM: DA1B PLANNING GGM4ISSI0N ^ OXMCIL Zoning Administrator 1977 t:,Jjark Mihich» ! Mptenber 26, SUBJECT: Nest Siore Lafayette Bay Association - 2440 Old Beadi Road Dredging of Chaimel and Disposal of %x>ils in Freshwater Biological Center Marsh Request to dredge existing boat diannel for navigability, ^^lication indicates ■wayiimim of 3 ft. of dredging not to exceed 50 ft. in width. The enclosed map of Shore Hills indicates the property owners involved. Note: the owner of Lot 19 is also included although the lot is not located on the slx)reline. Included in this proposal is a request to dispose of the spoils in the marsh located on the property of the Freshwater Biological Institute. The estimated voliae of spoils is 11^000 to 13,000 cubic yards or 1,100-1,300 10-yard truckloads. The enclosed letters seem to indicate the disposal of the spoils in the marsh as an iji^rovement of conditions in the marsh area. The proposed disposal area is located less than 1,000 ft. from the shoreline. PLANNING OOWaSSICN MEETING - October 3, 1977 work Session. Reviewed proposal. Discussed alteratives. Directed Staff infonn applicant present copies of original dredging permit approval from ENR to qualify project as maintenance dredging. STAFF - October 17, 1977 Certified property owners list just sidmdtted in p.m. Late for notification of neighbors. PLANNING OCMUSSia^ MEETING - October 17, 1977 Reviewed proposal. Inquired if applicant was able to obtain any docummtation of pr^ously approved dredging to distinquish maintenance dredging from initial dredging. A^licant's representatives were tnable to provide adequate docmenta- tion. Commission suggested applicants research further. Planning Coninission also discussed projected disposal of spoils in nearby marsh area located on property of Freshwater Biological Center. Suggested applicants submit credible reports indicating advantages of disposing of spoils on wtlmds and marshes. Planning Cormission also suggested applicant consider alternatives for disposal of s^ils. Representatives invested excessive cost for removal of spoils from immediate area. The Coninission informed applicant that economic factor generally is not considered as a hardship with the land. Planning Conmission tabled tiie issue mtil all property wners within 150 ft. of subject properties, including the Freshwater Biological Center, are notified of the propped project. Instructed applicant submit certified list of names and addresses of all property owners within 150 ft. of projected spoils disposal area also. 9 O 1