My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-27-1978 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1978
>
03-27-1978 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/9/2023 12:44:27 PM
Creation date
2/9/2023 12:42:41 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
115
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
JA <br />Hi <br />La <br />Bm*« <br />1 <br />S«cl <br />It I <br />|Utf <br />Coil <br />Mil <br />lirs <br />hm <br />ixt <br />f t <br />TO:Henry F. Muhlch, Zoning Administrator, and Planning Commission <br />FROM: <br />DATE: <br />A, P, Olson, Asst. Zoning Administrator <br />March 17, 1978 <br />SUBJECT: ^317 - The Farm at Long Lake <br />Subdivision <br />#31* <br />RE; The Planning Commission special request for policy guidance from <br />the Council as reviewed at the meeting held March 16, 1978 <br />General Council concensus was that the function of staff and the Planning <br />Commission is to review questions of policy and to make recommendations <br />to the Council for final determination. . Notwithstanding this, the <br />Council indicated the following: <br />1. <br />2. <br />3. <br />4. <br />Private roads are desirable as an alternative .to public roads for <br />visual and rural character reasons as well as maintenance responsi* <br />billties, but all roads should be constructed to minimum standards <br />and criteria for public safety and for permanent ease of maintenance. <br />The City Engineer should make recommendations as to technical <br />requirenents. <br />The City has had continuing problems with unsupervised easements <br />to lakeshore and has philosophical problems with extending lakeshore <br />"rights” to inland properties. The staff can legally provide <br />language to restrict any such easement to whatever use or intensity <br />should be desired as a matter of policy. In this particular <br />instance, and because the developer is agreeable, the issue may <br />be avoided by physically stopping the easement at a reasonable <br />distance from the shore, such as 5 ft. or 20 ft. or at the edge <br />of the conservation easement, or? <br />Conservation easements may include compatible uses and horse <br />pasturage may be such a use in certain circumstances. The Planning <br />Commission should make a finding as to the acceptability or lack <br />thereof in each specific instance and recommend accordingly. If <br />horses are allowed, a determination should be made as to proximity <br />to the shoreline or other water course for protection against fecal <br />pollution. Should horses be allowed, fences are obviously necessary <br />to protect the animals and the neighboring properties. The Planning <br />Comnission should note that a variance is required to pasture horses <br />and erect fences, but the variance may not be contrary to ordinance <br />intent. <br />Private easement platting, on site acceptability, legal document <br />language or provisions necessary to implement policy are technical <br />matters which should be determined by staff. <br />^A WJ ww Vft A A* AJ44A|^W
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.