Laserfiche WebLink
ma^ <br />m <br /># <br />MINUTES OF A PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING ^LD ON NOVEMBER 27, 1978 <br />Page 3 <br />Mr, Baxter was present. Applicant is requesting a <br />35* right yard setback and a 10* left side yard <br />setback as well as a lot area and width variance. <br />Discussion mostly concerned staff's request that <br />he reverse the side yard setbacks. Mr, Baxter <br />stated that although he would go along with- the <br />request, the topography of the lot made if more <br />feasible to build the proposed house as his plans <br />indicated. Hannah moved to approve the variances, <br />as originally aivvl tted, as the sitviation is improved <br />by the combining of four drastically substandard lots <br />into one building site due to the hardship of no other <br />land being available and the topography of the lot, <br />conditioned upon the combination of the lots. Motion <br />seconded by Hammerel. Vote: Ayes (6), Nays (0). <br />Motion passed unanimously. <br />PATRICK BAXTER <br />4120 Oak Street <br />VARIANCE <br />(#445) <br />Mr« Worre was present. Also present were his <br />neighbors to the south and across the street. <br />The request was for a 7* front yard setback and <br />a 10* side yard setback. Mr. Worre stated he <br />was now requesting a 10* front yard setback <br />instead of the 7* previously requested. Some <br />questions were regarding the height of the building, <br />numbers of zoosns proposed and their proposed uses. <br />It was stated that the existing garage would be <br />kept. Neighbors noted that there was a 4* X 6* <br />shed also located on the property. The main concern <br />of the neighbors was that they did not want the <br />addition so close to the south lot line as the <br />neighboring house is only 8* from the jnroperty line <br />and the proposed building would create a distance of <br />28* between the houses. Neighbors across the street <br />felt that the neighborhood was more "open” than <br />adjacent areas of Crystal Bay and was perhaps the <br />only area with those distinctive qualities - they <br />would prefer to keep this "openness". Planning <br />Commission also questioned the size of the addition <br />wondering if ^ would be feasible to make it smaller <br />thereby increasing the distances between the houses. <br />Mr. Worre stated that the size of the addition was <br />because of a landing and rtairs that would be needed <br />to get to the addition. It would also be used for <br />a breezeway and an access to the back yard*. <br />JOHN WORRE <br />1270 Arbor Street <br />VARIANCE <br />(#446)