My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-23-1978 Planning Minutes
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
1970-1979
>
1978
>
10-23-1978 Planning Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/3/2023 4:00:09 PM
Creation date
2/9/2023 12:36:12 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
# <br />9 <br />MINUTES OF A PLANNING COMMISSION MEmNG HELD ON OCTOBER 23i 1978 <br />Planning Commission met on the above date. The <br />following members were present: Chairwoman Hurr, <br />McDonald, Hannah, Frahm, Hammerel and Wilson. <br />Jeanne Mabusth represented the City staff. <br />Mabusth stated that the planners were busy <br />and would have a presentation for the proposed <br />November 30, 1978 meeting of the Council- <br />Planning Commission. All members were In <br />agreement with the November 30th meeting date. <br />Mr. DeSpllnter was present. Mabusth explained <br />that the request was a renewal of a variance <br />approved In 1977. Present was Mr. Weller, a <br />nel^bor who was also at the meetings for the <br />previous application, who was concerned about <br />the location of the house and how It would <br />affect his view of the lake. He felt that as <br />drawn the garage would block his view. Planning <br />Commission felt that the earlier approval had <br />recognized Mr. Weller's concerns, but that It <br />would have to be an agreement between the owners <br />and the City would not get Involved. At one point <br />the applicant decided that he did not want the <br />Commission to take any action on the proposal as <br />submitted and he would submit new plans showing <br />a different garage location. However, during the <br />discussion, the applicant stated that the new <br />plans would locate the garage directly on the <br />property line. Planning Commission stated that <br />they could not vote In favor of the garage location <br />on the lot line. Mabusth stated that she felt a <br />garage of approximately 12' In height would not <br />affect Mr. Weller's view because his house was on <br />such a high hill. The applicant then decided to <br />have the Planning Commission act on the proposal <br />as submitted. <br />Hannah moved to approve the variance for lot area <br />and width due to the topography and no additional <br />land being available. Motion seconded by McDonald. <br />ATTENDANCE <br />7:30 P.M. <br />COMPREHENSIVE <br />PLANNING COMMENTS <br />JAMES DESPLINTER <br />1121 Elmwood Avenue <br />VARIANCE <br />(#430) <br />Vote: Ayes (6), Nays (0). Motion passed unanimously <br />j
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.