Laserfiche WebLink
a::. <br />¥■ <br />m- <br />k. <br />MINUTES OF A PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD ON APRIL 10, 1978 <br />PAGE 2 <br />The Village Planner stated the marina committee <br />meeting was not held as had been planned because <br />the council member was not available. He asked <br />that another date be scheduled and stated he would <br />be in contact with the members to confirm another <br />meeting. <br />MARINA COMMITTEE <br />The Village Planner briefly reviewed the sketch plan <br />concept of the revised platting procedure. The <br />sketch plan review is conceptual only where the <br />Planning Commission gives direction before unnecessary <br />expenses have occurred. Then at the preliminary stage <br />the public hearing is held ar*d detailed engineering <br />and zoning questions are to 1.*- solved. The Zoning <br />Administrator noted that it takes about 30 days to <br />recieve information back from the agencies who are <br />asked to make recommendations required for preliminary <br />plat review. The Village Planner stated that the <br />so-called "simple" divisions over five acres would <br />go to staff, the Planning Commission for public <br />hearing and to the Council for final approval in <br />an accelerated schedule. <br />SKETCH PLAN ITEMS <br />SKETCH PLAN REVIEW <br />INFORMATION <br />A Public Hearing was scheduled for April 24, 1978. <br />Hassel asked if the old house would continue to be <br />used as a dwelling. Mr. Herfurth replied he hopes <br />someone will use it as he felt it was structurally <br />sound. Planning Commission saw no special problems <br />with the division as proposed. <br />AMERICAN REBUILDERS <br />FRED HERFURTH <br />2400 6th Ave. No. <br />SUBDIVISION <br />(#363) <br />Mr. Stielow was present. The Zoning Administrator <br />explained there were two plans sent to the <br />Commissioners. One is the original plan and one <br />is the revised plan. The difference being that <br />some of the lot lines have changed. The Commission <br />discussed the proposed plans. Hurr asked if there <br />would be any problems with the shoreline access. <br />Mr. Stielow replied he did not foresee any problems. <br />The zoning administrator agreed. Mr. Stielow explained <br />that they plan one dock for each lot owner. The chapel <br />will continue to be used as a church and the owners will <br />remain the same. The Commission addressed the existing <br />foundation, its location to the lot lines and any variances <br />that might be necessary. Some Commissioners indicated <br />unfavorable response to any creation of sub-standard lots. <br />They also indicated they were more in favor with the first <br />plan. Mr. Stielow was to return with additional revisions. <br />JURGEN STIELOW <br />565 Leaf Street <br />SUBDIVISION <br />(#367) <br />A <br />, <br />S <br />t <br />5; <br />vi <br />A