Laserfiche WebLink
^ ' <br />minutes of a planning commission meeting held FEBRUARY 27, 1978 - PAGE 19 <br />Commissioner Wilson stated with the original <br />plat Mr. Adams had asked for three riparian lots <br />and now two of the 3 lots only will have riparian <br />ights. <br />Commissioner Wilson moved. Commissioner Hammerel <br />seconded, a motion to approve the variance for <br />three lakeshore lots based on only two lots with <br />riparian rights. <br />Motion - Ayes (2); Wilson, Hammerel; Nays (2); <br />Hurr, McDonald; Abstain (2): Hannah, Frahm. <br />The motion failed. <br />Mr. Adams commented he was really hurt because <br />they are getting tied up with these side issues. <br />The first time the Commission reviewed the plat <br />they indicated they were very much in favor of the <br />project and felt this was a great development. <br />Commissioner Hannah stated he was not concerned <br />about the private easement, but was concerned <br />about the lakeshore variance. He commented <br />there is the issue of riparian versus lakeshore. <br />^Commissioner Hannah moved. Commissioner Frahm <br />seconded, a motion to approve the request for a <br />lakeshore variance unless prior to the Council <br />meeting the City Attorney shows that by granting <br />a conservation easement this takes away the riparian <br />rights of Lot 6 and then there would be no problem <br />because there only would be two lakeshore lots. <br />He added that he was not addressing the matter <br />of the private easements because at this time It <br />was not a function of this motion. <br />Commissioner Hurr asked if the conservation easement <br />and the pasture easement overlap. Mr. Adams <br />replied they abut one another. <br />The motion was withdrawn. <br />C <br />Commissioner Hannah moved. Commissioner Hammerel <br />seconded, a motion to recommend the variance be <br />granted conditioned on the fact the City Attorney <br />advise the Commission that Lot 6, by having a <br />conservation easement over its entire shoreline, <br />yill loose its riparian rights. Therefore, it is <br />a moot point as to how much of the property will <br />be considered the shoreline, and that the Planning <br />Commission concurs with the 200 ft. shoreline of <br />Lots 16 and 7. <br />TIM ADAMS <br />FARM AT LONG LAKE <br />#317 <br />(con*t) <br />_ _^ktfwt lia- ■ .Ti