My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12-09-2002 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2002
>
12-09-2002 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/4/2025 12:35:47 PM
Creation date
2/9/2023 9:56:06 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
310
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Kevin and Janet Manley, December 9,2002, page two <br />When our court action is completed, the court will have confirmed -• just ns it did in the previous <br />registrations ~ that you own your own lot all the way to the water, subject to the 40-foot street. <br />You also asked me to speak to how the Ekiofs fit into this. Let's review first the order of the lots. If <br />you were standing at Fletchers and looking across, you would see, from left to right; <br />Lot 5 (Purdy), Lot 6 (Delay), Lot 7 (Manley), Lot 8 (Ekiof). and Lot 9 (Gempler). I have helped the <br />Purdys and the Delays register the title to their individual lots down to the water, subject to the <br />street. Another attorney. Dale Moe, helped the Gemplers register theirs. <br />The Purdys and the Delays each registered land described as their lot, including whatever accre <br />tions lay between their lot lines, extended out to the water. This is what you started registering as <br />well - simply whatever lies between your lot lines as they are extended out to the water. The rea <br />son for registering this description is that it is what you already own. <br />The Gemplers requested the court to confirm in them title to something slightly different. I have a <br />copy of the registration order and decree for them, and it appears that they requested title not only <br />to the land between their own lot lines extended, but also to a pie-shaped piece of the accreted land <br />that actually lies between the extended lot lines of the Ekiof \ol <br />When your surveyor placed survey stakes to show the extension of your lot lines out to the water, I <br />understand the Ekiofs asked if they might be able to acquire from you a pie-shaped piece of the <br />accreted land that lies between the extensions of your lot lines, in order to make up for the part of <br />their property that was awarded to the Gemplers. <br />I understand you told them you would be glad to convey some kind of pie-shaped piece to them, but <br />you are presently still waiting foi them to give you survey and a legal description of the parcel they <br />would like you to convey to them. <br />When they do this, we will prepare a deed conveying to them, and notify the Examiner of Titles that <br />we now wish to confirm our owm title only to what remains. In the meantime though, our request to <br />the Examiner of Titles has been to confirm your ownership of all the land lying between your lot <br />lines extended to the water, subject to the street. <br />Finally, you asked about the word "seisen" or “seizen". What it means, is the naked legal title -- or <br />ownership -- of real property. It is sometimes called the fee simple absolute title. Whoever has the <br />seizen is the owner of the land. You see it used in mortgages, <^en you warrant to your lender that <br />you are %vell-seized of the land being mortgaged". <br />Seizen is always somewhere, and in this case ypu have the seizen of the lot all the way to the wa <br />ter, and the seizen for the lake bottom is elsewhere. <br />Please let me know if I can be helpful further. <br />Cordially yours, <br />Hugh Bishop
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.