11-25-2002 Council Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

#02>2789/02*2840 Dahlsirom Development LLC November 22,2002 Page 2 of 5 c. Resolution for Preliminary Plat Approval d. Resolution for Final Plat Approval (Phase I) e. Draft Ordinance to Rezone Property and Add Section 10.53 Subd. 11 Rc: PUD No. 4 Status of Application Review. On October 21 Planning Commission voted 7-0 to recommend approval of the project subject to a number of conditions noted below. Applicants requested that Council review be delayed until November 25 to give applicants time to addre.ss outstanding issues, which include: - anticipated minor revisions to site plan pending final wetland delineation certification by MCWD; - required revisions to site plan to address City Engineer ’s comments; - the Council’s request to address affordability options and potentials Applicants have allowed an extension of the 60-day review deadline to December 10. Applicants have not yet submitted new plan sets addressing the results of the wetland delineation noraddressing the engineer ’s comments. We are advised that due to the MCWD wetland review, the area of wetlands on the site is somewhat greater than originally defined, and will result in the loss of approximately 5 units, so we will be seeing a slightly revised layout in the next few weeks. Planning Commission Recommendation Planning Commission on a 7-0 vote recommended approval of the General Development Plan as proposed subject to the comments and notations by staff in the memo of October 18,2002. Their review and recommendation covered the following specific plan elements; 1. Site layout 2. Building styles and proposed materials and color palette 3. Provisions for pedestrian circulation, accessibility and connectivity 4. Recreation amenities, public and private 5. Overall landscape plan The motion included the recommendation that Council reach conclusions regarding lighting , the Stregtse^pe qf Kelley,Parkway, housing affordability, and development covenants. The motion t.xpressly included a recommendation for approval of the phasing concept, and approval of the preliminary plat and Phase I final plat. The motion included language indicating the approval recommendation is subject to Council review and acceptance of the final Traffic Study and tesqlutipn of the housing affordability issue to the Council’s satisfaction. The motion included a recommendation that applicants work with staff to resolve outstanding engineering and other related issues either noted in the staff memo or which may come to light in the future. I