Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OFTHE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />Monday, October 21,2002 <br />6:30 o’clock p.m. <br />(#14) #02-2840 DAHLSTROM DEVELOPMENT LLC, 2550 KELLEY PARKWAY, <br />Continued <br />Chair Smith asked for further clarification of sites she could look at with regard to a similar look <br />or density. <br />Mr. Hassler indicated that it was most difficult for them to find a similar two story rambler style <br />townhome for the Commissioners to drive by and compare. The Colt estate development in <br />Minnetonka would be the closest to this style he could think of, otherwise, he would put together <br />a list of locations with similar style homes and provide that to the Commission. <br />Chair Smith asked how soon they could provide the Commission with the representative list. <br />Hassler indicated that it would be first thing the next morning. <br />Hawn inquired as to the price points the different designs would be listed at. <br />Hassler stated that the lofts would be priced in the $225,000 range; the rambler style twinhomes, <br />in two or three different styles, would approximately run in the mid S400’s; and the two story <br />townhomes would be priced from $300,000 - $320,000. <br />With regard to the circulation, Johnston clarified that a sidewalk width of 3’ was proposed when <br />it merely was used as the walkway to the front door of a house, the average streetside sidewalks <br />were approximately 5 ’ wide, which allows for two people walking next to one another. Where <br />there would be bike traffic, there were separate trails proposed. Johnston indicated that it was <br />their desire to keep the hardcover at a minimum. He pointed out that the architectural look <br />would not be modular block, but mostly stacked limestone chunks. <br />Hawn asked if the limestone look would be similar to that of the airport. <br />Jolmston stated that the placement would be in a more random pattern. <br />Mabusth asked it the retaining walls would exceed 4*. <br />Johnston noted that it was their intention to stay below 4’, however, in the event the walls were <br />higher for some reason, the developer would install handrails. <br />Mabusth questioned the retaining walls proposed for the back loft building. <br />Johnston stated that the back loft building would be more narrowly defined in the future as the <br />developer meets with the City to plan that phase of the project. Johnston maintained that this <br />was merely a preliminary drawing for the building, with a final to be presented to the <br />Commission likely next fall. <br />Johnston added that in the near future, street names would likely replace the east, west, north, <br />and south designations. In general, Johnston pointed out that the Commission could look at the <br />Page 21 <br />1