Laserfiche WebLink
ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />MONDAY, OCTOBER 14,2002 <br />10. Appeal of Administrative Decision—Fox Street Driveway—Continued <br />Moorsestated they needed a grading plan to see how the trees would actually be affected <br />by the driveway installation. <br />Boyer stated they were anxious to begin construction on the house. Barrett stated that the <br />Council could table the application and the applicant would have to revise the plat. They <br />could still begin construction, but not on the driveway. <br />Nygard suggested they change the house’s design to accommodate the grade, put a drive <br />off the shared access, and save the trees. <br />Johnson stated that they had received verbal approval for the plan. Prosa stated the plans <br />were approved until they went for the building permit. <br />Nygard stated they might not be able to save the trees anyway. <br />Weinberger and Gaffron stated they had a grading plan, but it was insufficient and they <br />needed more detail. <br />White stated construction on the house could be started, but the curb cut was tabled. <br />Murphy stated that construction access would be allowed through the shared access drive <br />only. <br />Murphy moved, and Sansevere seconded, to table Item 10, Appeal of Administrative <br />Decision—Fox Street Driveway. <br />Vote: Ayes 5, Nays 0. <br />4. #02*2764 Commercial Planned Unit Development <br />Weinberger stated that the City considered a CPl'D district following a request for a <br />proposed office development on a vacant property in Navarre. The multi-unit office <br />complex would create individual office buildings, each held in private ownership. Such a <br />development is currently not possible in the B-4 district based on the minimum lot size <br />and width standards. The CPUD would create a district for the proposed development, <br />and would create a district that would allow other development options in the commercial <br />areas of the City where strict compliance to the underlying zoning ordinance is not <br />practical. <br />Weinberger stated that the CPUD would not affect the B-2 district, as B-2 is lakefront <br />property that has been reserved for marina use. The benefits of the CPUD are that it <br />would allow approval of each site plan with individual performance standards written into <br />the final development document. If the project were not completed, then the property <br />■ f <br />'i i <br />1 I <br />ii <br />? I <br />» <br />i <br />- i <br />■■ i <br />■i <br />;1 <br />n1 <br />Mn <br />‘ ^ <br />I i <br />I I <br />i ^