My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-28-2002 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2002
>
10-28-2002 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/9/2023 10:18:44 AM
Creation date
2/9/2023 9:50:51 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
309
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
1 <br />REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION <br />OCT 2 6 2002 <br />cirYOFOflONo <br />Date: October 25,2002 <br />Item No.: / ^ <br />Department Approval: <br />Name: Michael P. Gadron ^ <br />Title: Planning Director f' <br />Administrator Approval: £Agenda Section: <br />Zoning <br />Item Description: #02-2843 Professional Properties of Orono, 2765 Kelley Parkway <br />- Proposed Medical Office - Unresolved Issues Requiring Council Awareness and Discussion <br />Planning Commission on October 21 recommended approval of the General Development Plan for <br />the proposed medical/dental office after reviewing the most recent plan sheets. This item is <br />scheduled for Council action on November 12 assuming a number of remaining issues can be <br />suitably resolved. Some of the remaining issues require Council discussion and policy decisions. <br />These include: <br />1.There is still no signed purchase agreement for sale of the City property to the applicants. <br />Issues which appear to be holding up completion of the purchase agreement include the <br />following: <br />Potential need for wetland mitigation: <br />ISSUE: If the wetland on the site must be mitigated, who will be responsible, sellers <br />(City) or buyers? <br />ISSUE: If buyers are responsible for mitigation, how will that affect purchase price? <br />ISSUE: If buyers are responsible for mitigation, they propose do it on site. However, <br />the size of wetland is unknown, therefore area ofrequired mitigation is unknown, and <br />mitigation may not be possible on site... <br />Staff Recommendation <br />1. <br />2. <br />3. <br />The buyer should be responsible for mitigation <br />If the buyer is able to mitigate on site, the usability of the site is not <br />diminished, so the price of the land should not be affected. <br />If the mitigation has to occur off-site, but the buyer still has full use of the site, <br />this becomes an issue for negotiation in terms of if or how the costs of <br />mitigation are shared among the parties. <br />More detail on the status of the wetland issue is provided later in this memo.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.