My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-28-2002 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2002
>
10-28-2002 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/9/2023 10:18:44 AM
Creation date
2/9/2023 9:50:51 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
309
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
f <br />Baokground/Analysb <br />The exi;:tin({ house was constructed in 1973. A three-season porch was added to the lakeside of the <br />house in (this is a second porch not the porch proposed to be removed). The lakeside porch <br />required variances to hardcover and average lakeshore setback. Like this application, the 1999 <br />hardcover variance did not increase hardcover on the property since the three-season porch replaced <br />a deck. One condition of approval of the 1999 variance was all landscaping plastic be removed from <br />the property within 90 days of building permit being issued. Tlte permit was issued in November, <br />1999 but the plastic was never removed, or if it was it was later replaced. <br />For the purposes of this review the City should review the hardcover to assume no plastic is used for <br />calculating the existing hardcover totals. Thus, the statement that “the amount of hardcover is not <br />increasing with this project is not a true statement. The adjusted hardcover calculations are as <br />follows; <br />75-250’ Setback Existing 5,826 s.f. (39.3%) excluding 484 s.f. of landscape plastic <br />Proposed 6,049 s.f. (40.8%) additional 223 s.f <br />An addition would not appear to alter the character of the property or ch,*..ge how the property <br />drains. The adjacent property to the south had variances to allow similar alterations to the house. A <br />drainage swale is located betw een the two properties that doe* i good job channeling runoff from the <br />site. The applicant ’s house is located 11 ’ to the property line. The actual addition would be 17’ to <br />the property line. The neighboring house is located only 3’ to the property line. <br />Review of Hardship <br />The applicant ’s stated hardships are detailed in Exhibit A, <br />Staff Recommendation <br />Staff recommends approval of the variance application based on the following findings: <br />• The propeily has been developed as a single-family residential property since 1973. <br />• fhi' property is connected to sanitary sewer. <br />• 1 he lot is consistent with other properties in the locality. <br />• The addition partially replaces an existing porch connection between the house and garage. <br />The building expansion will only include an area that is surrounded on three sides by the <br />existing structure. <br />• No encroachment into the side yard setback will be required. The addition is 17’ from the <br />property line. <br />M2-2M4 Bnioi»MMamandC«l!lCte-H(MQa <br />2«l CtKofoiaiRoid <br />rap2oO
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.