Laserfiche WebLink
Planning Commission Review and Recommendation of August 19,2002: <br />The Planning Commission tabled this appIicaUon and advised the applicant to revise the site plan to <br />push the house and eaves back on the property to meet a 50’ setback to the lakeshore. Furthermore <br />the applicant could not exceed 660 s.f. which is the existing hardcover in the 0-75’ setback. <br />The adjacent property owner to the west (3635 North Shore Drive) appeared at the hearing and stated <br />he would be supportive of the variances as presented that evening if the existing arborvitae privacy <br />hedge that exists between the two residences remained. <br />The new site plw docs meet the parameters as established by the Planning Commissison. The <br />revised application requires review of the following variances: <br />I. Section 10.25, Subdivision 6 (B): Side Yard Setback: Minimum side yard setback in the <br />LR-IC zonmg district is 10’. Variance Requested: To permit addition to be 5 ’ and 7.5 ’ from west <br />side property line. <br />Side Yard: The rear of the residence is approved to be located 5 ’ from the west property line where <br />10’ is^uired. The lake side comer of the residence was approved to be 8.5 feet from the property <br />line. The applicant is proposing to locate this comer of the residence at 7.5 ’ from the property line. <br />The 5 ’ side yard setback was approved to provide one additional parking space on the property To <br />accommodate the second parking space next to the house, a side setback variance was required <br />because the house was shifted towards the west side property line. The rear comer of the residence <br />will still be located 5 from the property line. The city prefers residences to be a minimum of 10’ <br />apart, the lakeside comer will be 8.5 ’ from the adjacent residence rather than 9.5 feet per the prior <br />variances approval. The 10’ separation between buildings that City strives to maintain is for <br />ernergency Mccss as well as for aesthetics, to limit the visual density within neighborhoods. Access <br />will be available from the east side of the property. <br />2. Section 10.55, Subdivision 8: Structure within the 75 ’ lakeshore Setback. <br />3. Section 10.22, Subdivisions 1 and 2, and Section 10.56, Subdivision 16 (L) (1 and 2)- <br />Hardcover. <br />Total Area 0-75’-3,750 s.f. <br />Allowed - 0 s.f. <br />Approved = 615 s.f (16.4%) <br />Proposed - 420 s.f (12.9%) <br />Total Area 75-250 — 1,712 s.f. (Does not include 1,153 s.f. of shared drivewav) <br />Allowed - 428 s.f (25%) <br />Approved - 884 s.f (51.6%) <br />Proposed - 884 s.f (51.6%) <br />•o:OII) Marie Welch <br />H25 North Short Drive <br />Piir2