My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-14-2002 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1950-2024
>
2000-2009
>
2002
>
10-14-2002 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/9/2023 10:18:24 AM
Creation date
2/9/2023 9:50:00 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
345
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
4. Individual setlMcks would vary depending on the type of development proposed on an <br />individual property, current development patterns of surrounding properties, and the <br />general use associated with the CPUD. The setbacks can be establish^ by the City. This <br />celates to the general “flexibilit3r” the CPUD can allow. However, the ordinance is <br />written where in no case can a building within a CPUD be located closer than 3S feet to a <br />residentially zoned property. <br />5. The building height limit of the underlying zoning district shall apply. <br />6. Outside storage shall not be permitted within a CPUD district. <br />7. More than one building may be placed on one platted or recorded lot in a CPUD site. <br />8. Signs shall be restricted to those which are permitted as part of a general sign plan <br />approved by the city and shall be regulated within the CPUD approval. Any changes to <br />signs not permitted with the CPUD shall require an amendment to the CPUD approval. <br />9. The City may require a traffic analysis to be prepared by a registered traffic engineer <br />approved by the City to assess potential traffic impacts on local streets. If impacts on <br />service levels of roadways and intersections are anticipated, the project will be approved <br />only contingent upon a traffic management plan that adequately mitigates those impacts. <br />10. All CPUD developments shall be subject to the general performance standards for <br />lighting per the Zoning Chapter. <br />11. Pedestrian access shall be provided to the trail system by means of a public trail <br />constructed at the developer’s expense. Where public rights-of-way are available, at the <br />City’s discretion the trail may utilize the public right-of-way. Trail and sidewalk widths <br />shall be determined by the City to accommodate existing trait/sidewalk systems and/or by <br />anticipated useage. <br />12. It is not the intent of the City to restrict design freedom when reviewing project <br />architecture in connection with a site and building plan. However, it is in the best interest <br />of the City to promote high standards of architectural design and compatibility with <br />surrounding structures and neighborhoods. <br />13. Landscaping, Screening and Buffering standards are the identical standards as adopted <br />within the B-6 district. Please review the requirements within Subd. 6 (N) of the draft <br />ordinance. <br />Process <br />The process is a four-step process. <br />I. <br />2. <br />Concept Plan Review - General review of the proposal with the Planning Commission <br />and City' Council. (Typical Sketch Plan Review) <br />Master Development Plan and Rezoning - Approval of the master development plan <br />includes all building and site plans. (Public Hearing. Preliminary Plat review would run <br />simultaneously if platting is required. Generally platting is done with a PUD.)
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.