My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-14-2002 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2002
>
10-14-2002 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/9/2023 10:18:24 AM
Creation date
2/9/2023 9:50:00 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
345
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
REQUEST FOR COUNaL ACTION <br />••'OPTING <br />1 4 2002 <br />DATE: October 14,2002 <br />ITEM NO.: /j <br />Department Approval: <br />Niinc Gregory A. Gappa <br />Title Director of Public Services <br />Administrator Reviewed: Agenda Section: <br />Public Services Director's Report <br />Item Description: Accept Quotation Livingston Avenue Drainage Project <br />This property has a large drainage swale through the middle of the property that flows between the <br />house and the garage. This swale drains 3 acres of land that is fully developed at an urban density. <br />The drainage across this property has been a concern for many years with a substantial amount of <br />storm water runoff through this property. In 1998 a feasibility study was completed for a possible <br />assessment project to install an 18" storm sewer pipe from the low point in Livingston Avenue <br />though several properties up to the south side of the old Dakota Rail tracks from where the water <br />would then flow north. This project was never completed because there was opposition from the <br />neighborhood residents concerning the assessments for this project, and the impacts of project <br />construction across neighborhood yards. There is not a very good outlet for this water downstream, <br />so installing a pipe could be problematic and result in drainage problems further downstream. <br />Our recommendation is that, in many cases, installing storm sewer pipe to solve drainage problems <br />is not the most ideal solution. Whenever possible, maintaining existing overland flow drainage <br />patterns is the best solution in terms of environmental, financial, and property disturbance impacts. <br />Once you start piping water there is no end to the process of building pipes. No matter where you <br />end the pipe there is the possibility of complaints of too much water in the area. In existing <br />developed areas, there are normally not any drainage easements inplace, and obtaining easements <br />and constructing storm sewer projects can be expensive and difficult. <br />We have worked with the property owners and developed a project to solve the drainage problems <br />on this property while at the same time not changing the existing overland drainage pattern <br />downstream. The property owners have spent substantial money to reduce the drainage problem <br />between their house and garage with the construction of a rock lined swale to get the storm water <br />runoff past the house and garage. Before improvement of the drainage swale the house and garage <br />were subject to flooding. There is currently a catch basin sump structiue at the edge of the street that <br />does not have an outlet. This catch basin overflows and the water then flows across the front yard <br />and then into the rock swale. This area is relatively flat which results in a wet yard with ponded <br />water in the yard and swale. <br />The proposed solution is to install a 12" diameter perforated draintile outlet from the sump catch <br />basin that will outlet into the rock swale behind the garage. This should result in minimal <br />downstream drainage impacts as the water will continue to flow through the swale and then across <br />Page 1 of 2
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.