My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-14-2002 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2002
>
10-14-2002 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/9/2023 10:18:24 AM
Creation date
2/9/2023 9:50:00 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
345
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
The proposed residence meets all setbacks in the LR-IB zoning district. The proposed residence <br />meets structural and hardcover coverage requirements of city ordinances. <br />Discussion: <br />lequiring lot area md/or lot width varia«.s are subnutted and renewed <br />TOs prope^ h^ bmn vacMt wd ovwied by the adjacent property owner since the early 1 980 ’s The <br />lot WM part of the Bergquists’s Addition to Saga Hill subdivision. The Bergquists’s Addition to <br />ShoJe n P .Bergquists’s Addition to Saga Hill included land along <br />North Shore Dnve which was subdivided mto 9 lots of similar size. The subject lot was never built <br />on. The properties m the Bergquist’s Addition met the zoning standards of the time. Under current <br />zomng st^di^ the area is zoned LR-IB (Single Family Lakeshore). 1 acre .ots. All of Se <br />lots in this subdivision have remamed approximately half acre in size. This lot continues to be in character with the surrounding properties. nunues to oe m <br />Too city doesNOThavc m ordinance requiring that 2 lots have to be combined if they are owned bv <br />fte same person. The oidinancesrio not prohibit the sale of vacant substandard coiLonly owned <br />lots exc^t in mwewered However, in order to build on the property it must meet ^^r <br />zotung standards. (i.e. yard setbacks, hardcover and lot coverage by stiuctures) <br />Note that ««P> for a sliver of existing driveway and a portion of a small shed, the property has not <br />been encroached upon nor used to support development on the adjacent previously commonly-oivnedlot. <br />fSir o ”“ «>wr footage and provided with a sewer smb in <br />I970.^ause it was VKmt at that time, it was not charged the unit fee. The unit fee due if the <br />property is developed is $6,703 for 2002. “ <br />Access from North Shore Drive: <br />Currently thm is not access to the property fiom North Shore Drive. Because North Shore Drive is <br />a county ro^, Hennepin County decides whet, access should be located. A copy S^feSarion <br />was sent to Dave Zetterstrom at Hennepin County regarding the access. At the S^f Ws „ wrt <br />conuronts had not been twivrf horn Hennepin County. The applicant will need to get apptOT^ <br />ImmHennepm County beforebringing«x»sst«theproperty.(a,rfWbuildingpSS^^issued). <br />W2~2d28 Twiy Lund <br />4515 North Shore <br />Variances <br />9/9/2002 <br />Pc^e2oti
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.