Laserfiche WebLink
I <br />MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />Monday. Aagvit It. 2002 <br />0:30 o’clock pjn. <br />Smith once again asked if the Commission were willing to give a little bit on the square footage. <br />Mabusth stated that the original home had 660 s.f of hardcover and felt it justified to hold the <br />new residence to that figure, yet she stressed how important it was to maintain the 53* setback. <br />Smith asked if rhis meant up to the SO’ DNR recommendation. <br />Fritzlcr and Bremer stated that they would adhere to the approved 53’ and no less. <br />Mabusth stated that she would like to know how deep the proposed overhang would be. <br />Rahn stated that he could srpport the 50’ setback. <br />Ms. Welch asked the Commission to set the parameters for her and she would take them back to <br />Mr. Welch to redesign and meet those. <br />Mabusth reiterated that the applicant not exceed the 660 s.f and maintain a 50’ setback, and <br />asked her to have the surveyor mark the eave depth and distance from the lake on the survey the <br />next time around. <br />Ms. Welch felt she had enough to go on. <br />Rahn still questioned the overhang status. <br />Mabusth pointed out that if a structure meets setback, it is a legal nonencroachment if the eaves <br />overhang 1 1/2’; however, since this structure does not fall within the legal setback of 75’, the <br />overhangs are counted into the equation. <br />Smith moved, Frilalcr seconded, to tabk Application d02>2ll3, Mark Welch, 3625 North <br />Shore Drive, to allow the applicant time for redesign pnrposes. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. <br />PAGE 21