My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-23-2002 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets - Historical
>
2000-2009
>
2002
>
09-23-2002 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/9/2023 10:17:54 AM
Creation date
2/9/2023 9:48:36 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
283
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 9,2002 <br />PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS—DAVE RAHN, REPRESENTATIVE <br />None. . <br />PUBLIC COMMENTS <br />John Larson and John Jemey from the Lafayette Ridge Homeowners Association were <br />present. Mr. Larson stated that Lafa^tte Ridge consists of 20 homes, 15 in Minnetonka <br />Beach and 5 in Orono. The association shares common interest in the development, <br />including 800* of lakeshore. When they bought their houses, they were told the lakeshore <br />would be developed with docks for the homeowners. 16 slips were installed, leaving 4 <br />homeowners without lake access. Because the Orono portion of the development has no <br />lakeshore, those homes are without slips or dock usage. The fifteen Minnetonka Beach <br />homes were given slips and designated class A homes. One Orono home was given a slip, <br />the other 4 have been termed class B homes without lake access. <br />Although the Orono homes have no rights to use the docks or beach, the homeowners <br />association votes to charge the entire development for lakeshore related expenses, so <br />Orono homeowners arc paying for improvements they aren’t allowed to use. Mr. Larson <br />stated he wanted the docks distributed equitably. <br />Sansevere asked Barrett if the City could become involved. Barrett responded that Mr. <br />Larson and the others should find a private attorney to represent their rights. Because no <br />agreement with the City was being breeched, the City should not set a precedent of getting <br />involved in private claims. <br />Sansevere asked if they had contacted the LMCD. Nygard asked what the LMCD allowed <br />for slips. Mr. Jemey stated the LMCD allows 1 slip per 50 ’ of lakeshore. <br />Murphy asked Larson what his main complaint was. Larson replied that it was the way <br />slips are alienated, and the way the association treats the Orono residents. He stated there <br />is an article in the declaration stating it could not be changed for 20 years and only then <br />with a 75% vote. It s been over 20 years, but 75% of the association is slip-owners and <br />won’t vote for any equitable changes. Some slips are not being used by the owners, and <br />they rent them out. Mr. Larson estimates the value of a slip to the homeowner’s prooertv <br />is about $80,000. ^ <br />Sansevere stated he did not believe the City could help them. <br />White suggested they may find relief in how the lot was advertised at the time of sale—as <br />a lakeshore property. <br />Moorse sUted that when the subdivision was done, Orono and Minnetonka Beach had
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.