Laserfiche WebLink
1 <br />Home Occupation Ordinance <br />September 17,2002 <br />Page 2 <br />Recent Council interest in revisiting the home occupation issue was generated in 2001 because staff <br />had been recommending license approval for a small number of long-standing home occupations that <br />had one or more employees, in violation of the current code but not causing any problems. Council <br />suggested changing the code simply to allow home occupations to have one non-resident employee <br />under certain conditions. <br />As a result, in 2001 Planning Commission discussions on the topic of home occupation licensing <br />recommenced, and PC has spent significant time over the past 12 months considering the merits of <br />various methods of home occupation regulation as well as the standards that should be applied. The <br />result is a fresh approach to regulating Home Occupations, with the basic p'-emi'.c that such activity <br />should only require a license when it has potential impacts on a neighborhood. <br />Summary of Recommended Ordinance <br />The ordinance as unanimously recommended by the Planning Commission on September 16,2002 <br />incorporates a 2-tier system whereby non-impact home occupations (Level 1) would not need a <br />license; and potential-impact home occupations as well as non-compliant home occupations (Level <br />2) would be licensed. The recommend^ ordinance contains the following elements: <br />Section I. The licensing provisions of exising Code Section 5.40 are revised rather than deleted, <br />and now will reference the distinction between Level 1 Home Occupations which require no license, <br />and Level 2 Home Occupations which do require a license. <br />Also, Subd. 4 is added which requires a public hearing and public notification for any Home <br />Occupation license request. The idea is that if a home occupation rises to the Level 2 category, it <br />has potential impacts worthy of public discussion. <br />Section 2. The definition of Home Occupation is shortened to no longer include performance <br />standards which will now be in new SectionlO.63. The definition does, however, incorporate a <br />reference to the distinction between Level 1 and Level 2 home occupations. <br />Section 3. The 'home occupation* listing in the R- District list of ‘Accessory Uses’ is shortened, and <br />merely requires that home occupations comply with 10.63 and (when applicable) 5.40. <br />Section 4. This is the meat and potatoes of the ordinance. It creates Section 10.63, a new section <br />which includes: <br />Subd. 1 - A purpose statement and a detailed distinction as to the difference between Level <br />1 and Level 2 Home Occupations. <br />A