09-23-2002 Council Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

T^y /<cc'p Tnf»\ AAtm^HAHA Cfiew. t»^iticr ei/^ _ consent Permit Application No.: _________ Applicant: --------Cemn Teko . Temple **>‘®i*®** --------Camp ___ Location: Rule: B/D/F/N <45 Tonkawa Road. Ornnw Jleceived: 07/24AH .Complete: flfiZ!»>7iip Notification; oa/tl/ftl Recommendation: —-------— Approval. Permit should not be issued until the following conditions are met: 1. Reimbursement of mailing costs 2. Payment ofRuleJ fees 3. Submit a declaration for the preservation of wetland buffers, filter strips and vegetated swales which must be executed and recorded Background: The applicant is proposing to construct improvements on an 18.4-acre lot at the •address listed above in the City of Orono. The proposed project involves the construction of a 1400 square foot building addition, new pavilUon, ADA accesses, expansion of gravel trails, and «tiftr«»ti n** stabilization. *^0 wetlands currently exist on site and will not be impacted by filling or excavation activities as a result of tUs project. Permits would allow for the constiuctioa of buildings, impervious surface, shoreline improvements and establishment of wetland buffers. RuleB: Erosion control consisting of silt fence and inlet protection has been provided throughout the BulcD: As stat^ above two Type 3 wetlands of less than one acre in size currently exist on site and will not be impacted from filling or excavation as a result of this project. The applicant has agreed to declare two 16.S-foot buffers around the boundaries of delineated wetlands in accordance with RuleD. RuleP: The applicant has proposed to stabilize approximately 350 feet of shoreline with rip rap. Currently the shoreline is stabilized with vegetation, however, the qiplicant cites erosion problems as a need to install rip rap to better armor the shoreline. Rip rap will be placed at a 3H:1 V slope and consist of Class UI-IV rock which uimplies with MCWD Rule F fast-track criteria. BulfiJhL The applicant has proposed a total increase in impervious suifice of 13,700 square feet with the proposed project. The proposed trails will be no greater than 10 feet in width with adjacent five- fool pervious buffers and therefore will not be subject to Rule N requirements. In with Rule N, water quality, rate control and BMP requirements will be assessed in regards to toe increase in impervious. Runoff rale analysis shows that the proposed runoff from major rain events routed overland to swales and filler strips will not increase as a result of the project Drainage will be routed torough existing filter strips and cfcated swales which are <tg«gw*4 to p^orm water quality treatment torough infiltration and retention. The swales and filter strips will accomm^ate drainage from both existing and proposed iinpetvious surftce. fixie measures exceed MCWD requirements, staff has detetmined the application to be in Ji