09-09-2002 Council Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday, August 26,2002 7:00 o'clock p.m. (#6) #02>2789 Dahlstrom Development LLC, 2550 Wayzata Boulevard West - Concept Plan Consideration - RESOLUTION NO. 4852 Steve Johnston, of Landfnrm Designs, and Mr. Dahlstrom, the developer, were present Gaffiron reported that after reviewing the Revised Concept Plan on August 12, the City Council directed staff to draft a Resolution for Concept plan Approval, incorporating staff recommendations. Gaffron noted that five specific issues have been resolved in discussions between staff and the developer, including: 1) Kelley Parkway width and design - 32 ’ wide with 25 on street parking spaces, 5’ concrete sidewalks on both sides of Kelley Parkway behind an 8 ’ boulevard 2) Interior Roadway system width and designs - interior two-way roads will be 22 ’ from face of curb to face of curb, one way roads will be 16 ’ fc/fc, increased to 18 ’ fc/fc as needed 3) Location and design of trails and sidewalks - 8 ’ bituminous trail along Willow Drive and Highway 12 4) Design of main entrance to residential development -140 ’ wide water feature, leaving separation for one-way signage as necessary 5) P^estrian safety in relation to the “roundabout” - incorporating roadway and pedestrian walkway crossing design features and landscaping detail Gaffron noted that staff had incorporated these standards into the proposed resolution. Gaffron further noted that the Resolution consists of two principle sections; the Findings section (pages 2-9) which documents the City’s goals, intent, and policies pertinent to this development, and The Conclusions, Order, and Conditions section (pages 9-19) which establishes the conditions and expectations that the developer must demonstrate are met with the Development Plan submittals. The discussion with the applicants on August 22 also included the topic of affordability, which Gaffron stated would be addressed by the applicant this evening. As a sidebar, Sansevere asked to discuss item #20 from the evening ’s agenda. Authorization for a traffic study, and see this cost incorporated into the proposal. Saitsevere argued that if it were not for this development, the City would not be conducting a trafhe study at this time at all, thus he felt it was not the City’s responsibility to pay for it. He felt the developer should pay for the study since the affected intersections surround his development. PAGE 9 of 22