My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-26-2002 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2002
>
08-26-2002 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/9/2023 10:17:27 AM
Creation date
2/9/2023 9:47:39 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
287
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
//. Consider tMer revenue enhancements where appropriate. <br />A.) Do you have fees that are set substantially lower than the cost of the service provided? <br />Now may be a good time to adjust fees to more closely relate to the cost of the service, <br />thereby reducing the cunent subsidy from other revenue sources. Also, there may be <br />certain property tax supported services for which fees could instead be charged. <br />B.) If your city makes significant capital or maintenance expenditures for storm water <br />control, you may wish to consider creating a storm water utility and removing these costs <br />from the general fund. <br />///. Consider deveU^ing a plan to reduce appn^riations or delay Juture financial obligations <br />as a strategy to cover the potential loss of state aid payments. If aid reductions do not <br />materialize, you could make later a4fustments in your budget. <br />A.) Any state aid or credit cuts might not be enacted into law until the session ends, which <br />will likely be in late May. The cuts would likely be applied to the July and December <br />2003 LGA distributions and to the October and December 2003 MVHC reimbursement <br />pa>ments. Cities will already be nearly five full months into the fiscal year, which means <br />that spending reductions would have to be applied to the remaining seven months of <br />expenditures. <br />B.) You may want to consider budgeting for one-time expenditures that replace long-term <br />ongoing costs, such as technology investments that might replace a staff position or <br />consultant contract. <br />C.) Consider delaying any hiring decisions until the Legislature crafts its budget during the <br />2003 session. <br />D.) Consider delaying major purchases, as well as delaying new or expanded program <br />initiatives. <br />IV. Consider drawing down reserves to cover the loss of state aid. <br />A.) Carefully consider the periodic cash flow needs of the city before deciding to draw down <br />reserves. City fund balances are generally measured on December 31 of each year. This is <br />a “high water mark” for city budgets given the structure of state aid payments and <br />property tax distributions. An analysis of necessary reserves on a daily or weekly basis <br />would provide a more accurate picture of the city’s cash flow needs. <br />B.) State aid and credit cuts could be permanent and, ultimately, the city would have to <br />increase taxes or reduce spending to avoid a long-term city deficit. <br />C.) Drawing down reserves could potentially affect your city's credit rating and possibly <br />increase the cost of future borrowing for the city. <br />n <br />'ll <br />lift........ ......
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.