My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-26-2002 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2002
>
08-26-2002 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/9/2023 10:17:27 AM
Creation date
2/9/2023 9:47:39 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
287
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
r <br />ORONO CITY C'OUNCIL MEETING <br />MONDAY, AUGUST 12,2002 <br />7. #02-2793 Revis Stephenson, 1850 Fox Ridge Road—After-the-Fact Variance and <br />CUP—^Resolution No. 4844 <br />Acting Mayor Sansevere stated that, because the application had been before Council <br />several times already, they should only address new or currently relevant points. <br />Ga^n stated that the application had returned with a planting plan. The City Landscape <br />designer felt comfortable with the trees and the plan, and the plantings provided an <br />appropriate mix for the area. The total impact on the wetland was about 300 s f. much <br />less than initially believed, based on new analysis by Peterson Environmental <br />Gafiron stated that Weinberger ’s memo suggested Council could: <br />1. Approve the application as is, which would Involve extensive tree planting and would <br />not require fill be hauled away from the site. Also, existing vegetation would not be <br />des^yed. pe result would be somewhat inconsistent with the ordinances that protect the <br />wetland buffer areas, and the finished slope would be steeper than 3:1 <br />2. Approve an ^endment to the CUP and not variances, which would require removal of <br />any fill that has been added within 26’ of the wetland. A portion of the hillside would <br />need to be regarded and fill removed from the site. <br />die orighal^CUp'^^**°" require the finished grades to match the approvals granted <br />Revis Stephenson stated that he was comfortable with the resolution approving the plan as <br />IS. He felt the landscape plan was extensive and protected the buffer zone and wetland. <br />Eric Galatz attorney representing Mr. Chalfen at 350 South Brown Road, presented a 10 ’ <br />tall tree ^d stated that it represented the size of tree Mr. Stephenson would be planting <br />He said that his client felt the trees were completely inadequate. <br />Sansevere asked Gafiron if the City was comfortable with the tree size proposed by <br />Stephenson. Gafiron stated that a tree with a 2” diameter was appropriate because a larger <br />trM would require major machinery to get it planted into the slope. Also, smaller trees <br />t^e root more quickly than larger ones and will thrive sooner after the transplant 1 ‘A" - <br />2 diameter trees would be appropriate. <br />Galatz stated that he had brought with him Frank Svoboda, a wetland ecologist, and <br />Kathipm RyM, a landscape architect. The trees on the plan were shown at 35’ apart <br />wluch they felt was too far. He stated the plan could not have had serious review and that <br />Weinberger stated in his memo that the slope was still too steep and asked for 2-3” <br />Stephenson had buried trees and brush under the new <br />fill and they would rot, creatmg air pockets and uneven settling. <br />tdMA'fiii rnsum
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.