My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-26-2002 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2002
>
08-26-2002 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/9/2023 10:17:27 AM
Creation date
2/9/2023 9:47:39 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
287
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />MONDAY, AUGUST 12,2002 <br />6, U02-2789 Dahhtrom Development LLC—-2550 ” IFayzata Boulevard West— <br />PUD Rezoning and Concept Plan Approval—Continued <br />the homeowners association. <br />Platting of the portions of the property south of Kelley Parkway as outlets for future <br />All residential buildings should have pitched roofs. <br />T^e L^fts slwuld be setback from the west lot line a minimum distance of 80 ’ to create an <br />eff^tive buffer, and the 2 3 stoiy west-end loft units should be omitted to reduce <br />building profile. Separation distance between buildings should not be reduced. <br />The Lofts need to be 3 stories in height and will exceed the 30 ’RPUD height limit. <br />Planning Commission accepts the 40’ height, but recommends a low-pitched roof in order <br />to reduce the visual impact of the excess height. <br />^*iS**? Public Works site east boundary may be extended eastward to assist in <br />establishing a buffer to the Lofts, however, any plantings or other improvements should be <br />locat^ on Lofte site. The proof of parking area should be relocated along the west <br />boundary of the lofts site to minimize impacts on existing vegetation in the area. A <br />disclosure regai^g ^e Lofts buildings proximity to Public Works should be required of <br />Lofts buyers to help limit the expected high number of complaints about City activity and <br />noise. <br />Separation distances between townhome buildings are acceptable as shown, but any <br />separation less than 15’ should be reviewed to determine if a greater separation is feasible. <br />The proposed private road connection between the Lofts and the southwesterly townhome <br />toe curde-siZ^^i KeTey »«««" -he to. <br />M^le Ac 4 stalls parking per unit is double the amount required by code. Planning <br />Conumssion suggests guest parking be maximized where feasible. Parallel parking <br />should be added along West lane. ® <br />SaUevdopmen^^ provided are a positive feature and should be included in the
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.