Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />Wednesday, July 17,2002 <br />S:30 o’clock p.m. <br />-z <br />9-02- <br />Rahn suggested that the deck dimensions remain undetermined and that the applicant simply <br />adhere to the 300 s.f. coverage. <br />Hawn moved, Berg seconded, granting approval of Application #02-2805, Carson Erickson, <br />3415 Eastlake Street, variances for lot area, lot width, front yard setback, side yard <br />setback, and both 0-75* hardcover and 75-250* setback variances, noting that the structure <br />is within the 1,500 s.f. allowed and the deck size is no more than 300 s.f.. VOTE: Ayes 6, <br />Nays 0. <br />SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING FROM MONDAY JULY 15,2002 CONTINUED FOR <br />DISCUSSION <br />(#2) #02-2789 DAHLSTROM DEVELOPMENT LLC, 2550 WEST WAYZATA <br />BOULEVARD, REVISED PLAN FOR PRELIMINARY PLAT REVIEW, GENERAL <br />CONCEPT PLAN APPROVAL AND REZONING FROM RR-IB SINGLE FAMILY <br />RURAL RESIDENTIAL TO RPUD RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT. <br />5:44 p.m. - 8:14 p.m. <br />Gafiron stated that the applicant had worked through a few of the line items from the staff memo <br />on Monday night in which the Commission had started their discussion with regard to the <br />housing types, layout, and functionality. He questioned whether the Commission had addressed <br />their concerns with regard to item S of the staff punchlist, the proposed housing types, site <br />layout, functionality, etc. <br />Smith indicated that she felt other comments relative to housing still needed to be heard. Once <br />again, she asked the Commission to give the applicant as detailed suggestions as they could, in <br />order to supply them with adequate direction. <br />Gaffron noted that the applicant had already addressed several of the suggested changes from <br />Monday evening’s discussion and wished to hand out a revised plan. <br />Johnston highlighted the changes, noting that the most significant change was that the new plan <br />contained actual dimension between the townhomes for the Commission to look at. As shown <br />on the revised plan, Johnston pointed out that the closest towmbomes are 11’ apart, while many <br />are as much as 23 ’. <br />Smith felt the revised plans reflecting the dimensions were very helpful. <br />Johnston indicated that they had also taken out three of the rambler style townhomes and <br />replaced those with five smaller two story townhome units in an effort to open more space <br />behind them. Johnston pointed out that they had removed the third level loft units ftom the end <br />of the first building as well, creating a softer two-story look near public works. He suggested that <br />building a berm near public works would help greatly in screening the end units. Other than <br />those few changes, the unit count was still at 168, and Johnston stated that they would like to get <br />PAGE 2 OF 22 <br />uLMdifeMli