08-12-2002 Council Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday, Jub' 22,2002 6:30 o*clock p.m. (U9) *02-2796 MARK AND GINA KOSEK, 1875 SHADYWOOD ROAD- VARIANCE- Continued Saascvcrc moved, Murphy seconded, adopting RESOLUTION NO. 4835, requiring the removal of the shed in the 0*75* setback, removal and sodding over of the southern driveway, removal of stone borders and unnecessary boulder walls with the eiception of the 7* boulder wall around the red maple, the allowance for a 2* X 60* sidewalk from drive to front door, and granting approval for additional hardcover in the 75-250 ’ setback zone at 4,992 s.f.. for the property located at 1875 Shadywood Road. VOTE: Ayes 3, Nays 0. (#10) #02-2797 JAMES MURPHY AND SANDRA SMITH, 30 ORONO ORCHARD ROAD NORTH, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - RESOLUTION NO. 4836 Weinberger reported that the applicants had made a request for a conditional permit to allow m additional horse on the property, making a total of three horses on the property. While 5 acres is requi^ to permit 3 horses as an accessory use on the property when pasture land is required for feeding, the applicants have 3.6 acres and do not require pasture for feed purposes. Regardless of the size of the pasture, Weinberger pointed out that a proper manure management program is vital to the protection of nearby wetlands and elimination of odors. Jeremy Geske, of the University of Minnesota Extension Service, determined that due to the size of the operation and the way it is managed, the impact to the wetland from runoff from the site is extremely minor. Weinberger reported that the Planning Commission included a sunset provision within the Conditional Use Permit allowing the property to be used for three horses for a period often years. Two neighbors spoke in favor of the application to allow an additional horse, while other comments were attached, including one objection. Weinberger indicated that staff recommends approval of the application to allow three horses to be permitted on the property, since one additional horse will not significantly change the character of the property, and the applicants own the property that has the most impact. Sansevere asked why the Planning Commission felt compelled to attach a sunset date for the third horse. Although arbitrary, Weinberger stated the Commission felt they should choose an adeouate time frame to allow for the third horse. Sansevere stated that the Kokesh property was granted a CUP allowing 19 horses on 13 acres only recently. PAGE 21 of 3S a