Laserfiche WebLink
--- <br />MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, Jufy 22,2002 <br />6:30 o'clock p.m. <br />(M) U02-2793 REViS STEPHENSONp 1850 FOX RIDGE ROAD - AFTER-THE-FACT <br />CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND VARIANCES - Continued <br />Sanscvere asked how this could be acceptable if Mr. Chalfen ’s biggest objection is the lack of <br />screening. He wondered how it would grow back without being planted. <br />Galatz stated that in terms of what it would take to satisfy his client, Galatz argued that it is not <br />okay to break the law and then ask for permission. He believed this to be a bad precedent for the <br />City. His client insists that the applicant do what the City told him he could do, and nothing <br />more, even if that means restoring the hill and wetland. <br />Sansevere asked if staff was uncomfortable with what is existing. <br />Galatz stated that even in its most lenient recommendation, staff asks for some extent of <br />modification. <br />Assuming that Mr Peterson ’s wetland delineation is correct, Weinberger stated that staffs <br />recommendation is that there be no fill within 26 ’ of the wetland and that slopes don ’t exceed <br />3:1. Weinberger pointed out that thru settling the slope might get to 3:1 and questioned whether <br />It would be worth making the modification to the whole hill for 300 s.f. impact. He stated that <br />the question now is whether the further environmental impact on the weUand is worth mitiaatinc <br />for 300 s.f. ® * <br />Murphy indicated that the longer the process goes on the luckier Mr. Stephenson looks. The <br />slope is settling to 3:1 etc. In his view, the City has a couple of real options available. He would <br />propoM that they always have the fall back option 1, to remove and undo everything he did but <br />doesn ’t solve much. Option 2, allows the applicant to come back with an actual landscape design <br />that would incorporate everything that we have talked about, and although Mr. Chalfen would <br />not have final authonzaUon on it, Murphy would like to invite him to review the plan as well as <br />ms attorney , staff, and Council. The fall back position is always present, but he felt it would <br />behoove the interested parties to consider other options. <br />Galatz nwintained that Stephenson had already been allowed six months, and the City continues <br />to allow him more and more time to get further into it. <br />Sansevere stated that they were attempting to acquiesce to his client ’s concerns. If issues had not <br />bwn rased at the last meeting, Sansevere indicated that they might have been done with this <br />already. <br />Muyhy contended that he drove out to Mr. Chalfen ’s property and sat in the driveway, and was <br />hwd pressed to see how awful this is. This being summer, Murphy recognized that the view <br />might be somewhat different in the winter but not necessarily to the degree Galatz asserts <br />Murphy reiterated that everyone was well aware of the baseline, and would like to give the <br />PAGE 26 of 35