My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-12-2002 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2002
>
08-12-2002 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/9/2023 10:17:04 AM
Creation date
2/9/2023 9:39:50 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
369
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
n <br />MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, Jfnty 22,2002 <br />6:30 o*clock p.m. <br />(U7) U02-2791 DAVE AND JODI HAHN, 1385REST POINT ROAD- VARIANCES- <br />Continued <br />Rahn stated that this is an unusual case, one that you might see once in 20 years. <br />Ga^n maintained that the City had typically held people to 25% in rebuilds in most cases, <br />^le they had gotten away from the 25% figure for a time, over recent years the Council has <br />^n much more strict. He stated that, obviously, they were not as strict on the neighbor next <br />door, however there are nuances and exceptions to eveiy application. Since his comment from <br />the minutes became part of the resolution, Gaffron felt it would be in the City ’s best interests to <br />**thA disappear. Consistency, in this case, must rely on replacing the old garage <br />Murphy Mked if the new garage addition could be reconfigured to add additional storage space <br />that might be lost by removing the old garage. <br />Rahn stated that it would be difficult to build enough space into the addition to justify the <br />removal of the two-story garage. <br />h^n whether, the City had been more lenient on his neighbors than they <br />Gaffron stated that, if forced to address that question, he would have to say that considering what • <br />argued that he had presented the City with a huge finding with regard to the floodplain that <br />affected more than 1/3 of his property. He stated that this originally was a rebuild, but even so, it <br />met and meets the average lakeshore setback. <br />ap^caf “ a Planning Commissioner, whether he would have approved this <br />impact. <br />Murphy asked if the 25.3 % hardcover figure reflected the removal of the driveway. <br />PAGE 16 of 35
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.