My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-22-2002 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2002
>
07-22-2002 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/9/2023 10:16:23 AM
Creation date
2/9/2023 9:37:55 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
555
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
• Dr. Michael Murphy, University of Minnesota Extension Office, conducted a site visit <br />and determined our use is in keeping with appropriate standards and the number of horses <br />should not be an issue, especially relative to adequate feed for horses. City codes about <br />horses are a little vague in this area, but it appears the primary concern is that horses have <br />adequate food by grazing. Our horses are fed hay and grain that meet all their nutritional <br />needs. The turnout area serves as an exercise area, not a source of food <br />Numerous neighbors provided written and/or verbal support for horses on our property; <br />adjoining property owners who have lived here since 1979 stated in writing that horses <br />have been on the property at least since then <br />• In fact, aerial city photographs taken much earlier show our bam and turnout, as well as <br />an oval track that no longer exists. The bam has been here for more than 60 years and a <br />variable number of horses has been on the property for the same period of time <br />At the time of subdivision that created our property, the City Council tacitly approved the <br />continued use of this p'-operty regarding horses by leaving the bam and its use intact. The <br />only documentation pertaining to the number of horses occurred in 1987 when the city <br />advised the previous owner that two horses were permitted. The bam was originally a <br />nine>horse bam <br />• In late 1988, when we purchased the property we were told of this documentation by our <br />real estate agent and the previous owner when we were shown the property. Our use has <br />not changed fi:om the previous owner, except for improvements <br />This property is 3.68 acres, well over the two-acre minimum for RR-IB zoning district. <br />It adjoins other two-acre or larger parcels and the Luce Line Trail (and horse back riding <br />trail designated for horses only) and other open space, including a shared private <br />driveway. The city flies on our property include a reference to 4.2 acres; this may be so, <br />accepting at face value the previous owner's statement that it measures 4+ acres, “when <br />you include the driveway ” <br />• The turnout area used by our horses has vegetation of various plant types every summer <br />(We even have to mow it!) and we have maintained the same-sized area that was used by <br />the previous owners. <br />7; <br />rr rej j <br />i
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.