My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-22-2002 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2002
>
07-22-2002 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/9/2023 10:16:23 AM
Creation date
2/9/2023 9:37:55 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
555
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
OR3NO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />MONDAY, JULY 8,2002 <br />8. #02-2796 Mark and Gina Kosek, 1875 Shadpvood Road, Variance—Continued <br />stated that nobody had told them that hardcover was going to be an issue. The size of the <br />house didn’t change, so they thought they still had area to work with. The additions to the <br />driveway and retaining walls happened as needed and did not require building pennits. <br />Smith stated that the driveway is larger than originally shown in the plans, and that at <br />some point the applicant nee^ to be aware of what they’re doing. Sansevere stated that <br />because they built the house themselves, and were not trusting outside experts, they had <br />more responsibility to inform themselves and become knowledgeable. Kosek stated that <br />at the time of constmction they were at 22% hardcover. The drive addition and retaining <br />walls pushed them over. They didn’t think that retaining walls would count as hardcover, <br />and they have about 400 s.f in the walls alone. <br />Kosek added that she felt having to remove the gardening shed was punishment because it <br />would not affect the hardcover in the 75-250’ zone, and they were still under the total <br />hardcover allowed for the entire lot. Weinberger stated that she would be allowed to have <br />a lock box on the property in the 0-75’ zone, size 4’ x 5 ’ x 4’ high. <br />White moved, and Murphy seconded, to direct staff to draft a resolution allowing <br />construction of the decks as requested conditional upon removal of the gardening <br />shed and all unnecessary’ retaining walls; in addition to the decks, the applicant <br />would be allowed to pave a 2’ x 60’ sidewalk from the driveway to the front door and <br />to place a 4’ X 5 ’ X 4* lockbox in the 0-75’ setback zone. <br />Vote: Ayes 5, Nays 0. <br />*9. Extend Telecommunications Tower Moratorium—Ordinance No. 220,2"^ Series <br />Murphy moved, and Sansevere seconded, to adopt Ordinance No. 220, Second <br />Series, extending an interim moratorium on the granting of building permits, land <br />subdivisions, rezoning applications, conditional or special use permits, variances, or <br />other authority relating to the siting of wireless communications facilities and <br />structures in all zoning districts in the City of Orono. <br />Vote: Ayes 4, Nays 0. <br />MAYOR/COUNCIL REPORT <br />Sansevere stated that they should spot-check cigarette venders again to see if they are <br />complying with the legal age and carding minors. <br />Sansevere stated he had received a letter from Dana Wells regarding the Orono Lane <br />issue. Moorse stated that the residents were told not to install a dock before the house is <br />constructed, but they are currently running electrical cable through the yard and it upset <br />the neighbors. Gaflron stated they would prefer the residents not do yard work before
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.