My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-22-2002 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2002
>
07-22-2002 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/9/2023 10:16:23 AM
Creation date
2/9/2023 9:37:55 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
555
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
• I <br />MINUTES OFTHE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />Mondayt Jax 17,2002 <br />6:30o*dockp.n. <br />plan did not impact die wetland or wetland setback. Currently however, die fill is located as close as 17’ <br />to the edge of die wetland, with an average distance from the hill to the wetland boundary of between 20- <br />25\ <br />(W»-2793 RE VIS STEPHENSON m. Continued) <br />Weinbfiger expanded on the three recommendation proposed by staff: <br />I) The variance request to allow encroachment of the base of the hill to widiin 26’ of the wetland be <br />denied. <br />2) The portion of the afteMhe-fact permit for the existing gndes is not consistent with the City’s general <br />recommendations that newly created slopes not be less than a 3:1 slope. In essence the applicant had <br />extended his back yard an additional 38’. <br />3) Staff has requested that Mr. Stephenson have the adjacent property ownera join him in this application <br />since the request is to allow the land alteration beyond the property tines. <br />• Comments from the adjacent neighbor to the north, Toby Jason, state that he has no issues with <br />the project and is in full support of it He views it as an improvement to die property with regard <br />to safety and believed the drainage was improved. A late fax submitted by neighbor Robert Hare <br />supported the results of the project <br />Weinberger then cited 6 conditions in his report that should be included as part of any recommendation. <br />Mr. Stephenson questioned Weinberger whether his intention was to approve the sideyards as long as <br />neighbors voiced their support <br />Weinbergs indicated that with neighbor support, it would create a better scenario; however, the <br />questions regarding slope variances and wetland alteration mudn. <br />PAGE 16 OF 42
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.