Laserfiche WebLink
H02-2793 Revis Stephenson <br />ISSO Fox Ridge Road <br />Page 3 of3 ____________ <br />2.The portion of the after-tlie-fact permit for the existing grades is not consistent with the City’s <br />general recommendation that newly created slopes not be less than a 3:1 slope. The point on the <br />property where the flat area of the back yard begins to slope is less than a 3:1 slope and should be <br />correct^. <br />The original plan to fill the back yard was to make the back yard safe elitptinating the steep drop <br />only 30* from the back of the house. The fill changed the slope of the back yard from a steep <br />drop to a gradual slope. The e.\isting grades have extended the back yard an additiona^^ This is <br />* very clear on the illustration attached as Exhibit C. You can see how the proposed plan would <br />eliminate the very steep slope, but not extend the yard. Staff is not opposed to this change in the <br />plan, however the grades should be changed to not be less than a 3:1 slope and remove the base of <br />the hill fh>m the 26' wetland setback. <br />3.Staff has requested the Mr. Stephenson have the adjacent property owners join him in this <br />application since the request is to allow the land alteration beyond the property lines. The legal <br />notice was mailed including those two properties as part of the new application. Both property <br />owners have consented to the project. <br />Knowing the issues relating to the finished grades, the property owner did seed the hillside and plant some <br />trees. If the grades have to be changed to be in compliance with the previous plan, or to reflect a change to <br />the grades based on the excessive slope, it may require the hill to be reseeded and replanted. <br />Any recommendation shall include the following conditions: <br />1. <br />2. <br />3. <br />4. <br />5. <br />All slopes shall be restored with a minimum of 4-inches of topsoil and seeded or restored <br />with some type of erosion control measure, erosion control plan shall be approved by the <br />MCWD and City Engineer. <br />The silt fence shall be relocated to be a minimum of 26' to the edge of the delineated <br />wetland, and any fill shall be removed from within 26* of the wetland (unless a variance to <br />permit fill within the wetland setback is approved). <br />Ail soils within 26' of the wetland shall be decompacted following construction activity. <br />The City Engineer shall review and make recommendations on the plan prior to any <br />additional construction activities and corrections. <br />No portion of the hill shall not less than a 3:1 finished slope. <br />COUNCIL ACnON REQUESTED <br />Motion to direct Staff to drafi a resolution of approval or denial based on the findings and conclusions made <br />by the Council. <br />The final resolution for adoption will be presented to the Council July 22,2002.