07-22-2002 Council Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD ON JULY 14,1397 (U5 - #2248 David and Jodi Rahn - Continued) Van Zomeren reported that the application was reviewed at the June 23 Council meetiqg for the variance and CUP to restore and build an addition to an enstipg residence located in the 0-75 ’ setback. A 5.3' ride yard setback would require a variance from the l(f requirement. A lakeshore setback variance is required as well as a 0-75' hardcover variance for 19% hardcover, currently existing at 9%, where none is allowed. The CUP is required to alter land located in the 0-75' setback. The topograpl^ b such that the structure could partially be in the flood plain. Jriibour noted that it b necessary to see the topogra).hy and elevation of the property, van Zomeren agreed that the main issue b the topography of the lot and low elevation. Van Zomeren reported that the Planning Commission recommended approval as noted in the staff memo.• • Peterson, who along with KcU qt was not present at the 6/23 meeting, asked FKnt tus opinion of the application. She indicated she had a understanding of the thoughts C'^ labour and Goettea Goetten said Flinfs opinion is rimilar to her own. Jabbour noted tiiat it had been determined that the application should receive a full Council decision. Peterson brought attention to the discussion regarding the flood plain mitigation. Goetten indicated that riie felt the residence could be moved back on the property. Jabbour responded that a move would eliminate a sediment pond that helps the lake and be a burden to find a new legion for good stormwater management for the property owner and Watershed District. Jabbour acknowledged the importance of the 0-75' setb^k but Wt this was a good example of where an exception could be made. Rahn also indicated that the roof line allows for water directed away from the lake. He also noted that the poim was sandy and water ponds in the low lying area, Kellty was informed that the applicant is the current owner of the property. Rahn said he reviewed the ordinawe and referenced Section 10.55 regarding flood plair. management. It encourages providing storage for runoff and elevating the building rite. He said the code also allows for the average lakeshore setback. Peterson said the Coundl historically does not approve structure in the 0-75' setback but noted the extenuating circumstances mvolved in thb application. Goetten said the lot b very small and substandard. She agreed that h would be expensive to move the reridence out of the 0-75' setback, but said she has never voted for new hardcover in that setback. The applicant responded that the hnd is highest by the lake and then slopes downward.