Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMNflSSION MEETING <br />Monday, June 17,2002 <br />6*30 o’clock p.m. <br />Ms. Kosek indicated that the patio doors were not added intentionally to cause trouble, they were moved <br />with the thought the square footage was available. <br />Bremer indicated that she did not have a problem supporting the request based on what had been <br />suggested by Commissioner Rahn. The nonessential rock and old driveway need to be removed. She <br />agreed that it was difficult to allo'v a 37% variance for a nonconforming smaller lot and not allow this <br />more reasonable request. <br />Berg concurred. <br />Rahn believed the driveway could not be reduced and safely allow the applicants to access Highway 19, <br />he was in support of the application and believed it to be a minimal request, <br />Frtizler indicated that he did not wish to see additional hardcover on the property and believed the <br />retaining walls should have been built into the original request. <br />Smith felt more concessions needed to be made before she could support the application. <br />Ms. Kosek concurred with Commissioner Rahn that the old shed ought to be removed, in fact, she had <br />suggested to him herself. <br />Rahn moved, Bremer seconded, to approve the hardcover variance for Application #02-2796, Gina <br />Kosek, 1875 Shadyw'ood Road, on the condition that the old shed be removed, all stone borders and <br />nonessential bonider walls be removed, and the original south drivew ay as required «>y the first <br />permit. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 2. With Fritzler and Bellows dissenting for reasons expressed <br />earlier. <br />(#4) #02-2 PIN COUNTY, 3880 SHORELINE DRIVE, RENEWAL VARIANCES <br />Smith moved. Bellows seconded, to table AppTlcatioQ^2-2776 Hennepin County, 3880 Shoreline <br />Drive, as no representatives for the Applicant were presentTVOTEt^yex 6, Nays 0. <br />PAGE 41 OF 42