My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-08-2002 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1950-2024
>
2000-2009
>
2002
>
07-08-2002 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/9/2023 10:15:41 AM
Creation date
2/9/2023 9:37:21 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
264
PDF
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, June 24,2002 <br />7:00 o'clock p.m. <br />(M2-2780 OTTEN BROTHERS NURSERY- Continued) <br />Gaffron reminded the Couneil that the property is in the B-6 district and they are amending the <br />PUD that zones just this property. He cautioned the Council that they do not want to give the <br />impression that they are rezoning the B-1 district. <br />White indicated that he did not oppose additional signage, but did not want to see it all over. <br />Murphy asked Mr. Otten if they would like to advertise that the restaurant exists. <br />Mr. Otten indicated that they would like to include the diner in their signage and in their ads. <br />Weinberger stated that the Planning Commission felt the advertising could refer to the diner <br />subtlely, without large additional signage that would attract traffic. <br />Mr. Otten suggested scratching items #1,3, and S from the Planning Commission and staff <br />recommendations. <br />Attorney Barrett suggested omitting items 1 and 5 since a Class 1 Restaurant is beyond the <br />cafeteria style proposed here. <br />Murphy withdrew his earlier motion. <br />Murphy moved. White seconded, to approve the request to amend the PUD Agreement to <br />allow a concession stand style restaurant to operate within the building as an accessory use <br />to the nursery retail, subject to the Planning Commission and staff recommendations, <br />omitting items 1 and 5. Vote: Ayes 4, Nays 0. <br />Sansevere moved. White seconded, to allow Class 1 restaurants, in general, to be added as <br />permitted nses to the PUD Agreement Vote: Ayes 4, Nays 0. <br />Murphy suggested scheduling a work session to look in greater detail at the PUD list and make <br />recommendations or changes to the line items. <br />Mr. Otten inquired over the legality of the City to continue to revisit and change the PUD <br />Agreement. <br />Attorney Barrett stated that it is permissible and within the zoning power of the City to make <br />changes to the agreement. <br />• <br />Weinberger noted that the changes to the PUD Agreement will be on the July 8,2002 agenda for <br />adoption of the amended documents. <br />PAGE 9 of 17
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).