Laserfiche WebLink
ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Tuesday, M^ 28,2002______ <br />ZONING ADMINISTRATOR’S REPORT <br />6. #02-2772 John and Donna Crotteau, 1405 Sixth Avenue North - Variances <br />Resolution No. 4817 <br />John and Donna Crotteau, applicants, and Brian Novak, architect, were present. <br />Weinberger explained that the applicants have requested variances to permit construction of <br />additions to the existing house. The additions are proposed to be located within a bluff setback and <br />within the 30’ top of bluff setback. I he application also requires a variance to permit the garage <br />addition 20.5 ’ from the side lot line where a 30’ setback is required. <br />Weinberger identified 5 individual modifications and additions included in the application, however, <br />the applicants revised these based on DNR review and staff recommendations. <br />Weinberger stated that the Planning Commission recommended approval of the variances to permit <br />construction of the residential additions within the 30’ top of bluff setback for the kitchen/entry way <br />and bay additions on a 7/0 vote. <br />Weinberger continued that the Planning Commission was split 5/2 recommending approval of <br />variances to permit a lakeside addition to the residence, creating a further encroachment into the <br />bluff area. This portion of the project includes the 13’ of additional encroachment for the living <br />room expansion. <br />The Planning Commission voted 7/0 to recommend the denial of a variance to permit the garage <br />addition to be located 20.5 ’ from the side property line where a 30’ setback is required. <br />Weinberger noted that several factors played into this denial, including the fact that the property is <br />a conforming lot and that the garage could be shifted 9.5 ’ to the west leaving a 30’ setback. <br />Weinberger stated that Peter Leete of the DNR has stated that they object to the portion of the project <br />that further impacts the bluff and suggested the project be scaled back. Due to elevations, access <br />around the house becomes rather difficult, and fill or alteration is not permitted on a bluff. <br />Weinberger stated that in consideration of the comments received from the DNR, staff continues to <br />recommend approval of the addition but due to the limited access around the building and the <br />potential impact on the bluff, staff is recommending the lakeside addition be reduced to 8 ’. The staff <br />recommendation allows for an addition to extend an additional 5 ’ rather that the proposed 13’. <br />The Crotteau ’s offered a revised proposal for consideration by the Council, which included a scaled <br />back living room addition to 10’, tied into an existing deck and a 2’ raised roofline. The builder <br />explained how they are working to improve the existing conditions, including mitigation, and <br />extending footings with no additional fill. <br />Page 4 of 16