My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-10-2002 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1950-2024
>
2000-2009
>
2002
>
06-10-2002 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/9/2023 10:15:15 AM
Creation date
2/9/2023 9:27:36 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
249
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Tuesday, May 28,2002______ <br />(M)2-2782 PROFESSIONAL PROPERTIES OF ORONO, Continued) <br />Sanseverc made reference to Council Action request number 3a. He believed that more grecnspace <br />to the west was desirable. He asked Moorse to contact the neighboring property owner, Gagne, and <br />inquire about the price. Furthermore, he suggested the City purchase this parcel in order to solve all <br />the issues here. <br />Murphy felt he could support this action. <br />Moorse believed that this second piece would be less costly than the City ’s comer parcel and he <br />would contact the current owner. <br />Nygard supported this action as well. <br />Murphy reiterated the desire to move the parking and asked the group how set in their plans they <br />were. <br />Dr. Berg stated that they had already examined many other layouts and settled on this one. I Ic stated <br />that many hours have gone into determining what makes the most sense and this is it. They would <br />have to go back to the drawing board and begin anew if this did not work. <br />Dr. Kottemann felt that if Kelley Parkway were moved some of the parking could be shifted as well. <br />Murphy stated that he was troubled by the lack of flexibility the applicants have shown, especially <br />after the City has been trying to work with them this evening to come up with alternatives. <br />Mayor Peterson reiterated her concern over the setbacks. <br />White suggested flip flopping the parking lot. <br />Ritter stated that parking still needs to be in the front of the building and if the building were flipped, <br />a new development next door could essentially block or back up to theirs. <br />Gaffron acknowledged that this is probably plan revision number 16 that the doctors have considered <br />and he recognized the amount of work they've put into their proposal. He also noted that wile <br />they ’ve virtually already gone through their whole planning process with limited City input, the City <br />has just begun its formal evaluation process. <br />Mayor Peterson asked Gaffron to explain stafTs concerns. <br />Gaffron indicated that the setback on Kelley Parkway is most notable and believed while the issues <br />can be worked out. they need to lay out an aesthetically pleasing solution. The buffers between the <br />trail and parking, circulation around the site, and the service area need additional work. <br />Pafc9ofl«
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.