My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-28-2002 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2002
>
05-28-2002 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/9/2023 9:30:28 AM
Creation date
2/9/2023 9:27:20 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
241
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Application Date: 4/17/02 <br />Deadline: 6/16/02 <br />TO:Chair Hawn and Orono Planning Commission Members <br />Ron Moorse, City Administrator <br />FROM:Paul Weinberger, Zoning Administrator <br />DATE:May 13,2002 <br />SUBJECT:i/02-2790 GretchenShaw <br />1750 Shadywood Road <br />After the Fact Variance Renewal <br />List of Exhibits: <br />A <br />B <br />C <br />D <br />E <br />F <br />Application <br />Resolution No. 4264 <br />Approved Site Plan <br />Building Plan Set (1999) <br />Site Photos <br />Plat Map <br />Application <br />The applicant has requested an after the fact renewal of variances previously approved on April 12, <br />1999. The variances approved in 1999 allowed tlie prop>erty owners to add a second stoiy addition to <br />the house located within 75 ’ of the lakeshore and permitted the addition of an attached garage. The <br />property currently does not contain a garage. <br />The applicant has stated in her letter of application that the project was not completed within one <br />year of the approval due to a family illness. <br />The after the fact portion of this application is for the approval of the second story addition. The <br />property owner had hired a contractor to repair the e.xisting leaking dormers and window s. It was <br />determined the dormers required replacement, and were replaced larger than what had previously <br />existed thus resulting in an expansion of the building envelope within 75 ’ of the lakeshore. The <br />dormer expansion, rather than a complete 2*^ story addition as approved in 1999, will have a reduced <br />visual impact from the lake and adjacent properties. Normally the City will issue a permit when a <br />building addition is within the envelope approved per a variance if it is determined the building <br />addition has less impact and is in character with the approved plan. In this case a permit would <br />likely have been issued without Planning Commission or Council review if i* had been applied for <br />within one year of the variance approval. <br />3
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.